Members of the Iraqi Shiite militia, Kataib Hezbollah. The group denied responsibility for the recent attack on US forces based in Iraq. EPA
Members of the Iraqi Shiite militia, Kataib Hezbollah. The group denied responsibility for the recent attack on US forces based in Iraq. EPA
Members of the Iraqi Shiite militia, Kataib Hezbollah. The group denied responsibility for the recent attack on US forces based in Iraq. EPA
Members of the Iraqi Shiite militia, Kataib Hezbollah. The group denied responsibility for the recent attack on US forces based in Iraq. EPA

Iraq truce still holding despite attacks on US forces, sources say


  • English
  • Arabic

Live updates: Follow the latest on Israel-Gaza

An unannounced truce that led Iran-backed Iraqi militias to halt attacks on US forces in the region remains intact despite two recent incidents, sources close to Baghdad and armed factions told The National on Tuesday.

They said the attacks on two US bases in Syria and Iraq were not approved by the umbrella organisation of the armed groups, indicating possible differences within the bloc concerning military strategies.

The rockets fired at US targets were the first since early February when the truce that involves Washington, Baghdad, and Tehran was reached. The US State Department confirmed one of the two attacks.

Some of the factions, including Kataib Hezbollah, are pushing for cancelling the truce because of what they consider as procrastination from the Americans and the weak [Iraqi] government position
Shiite legislator close to armed factions

However, an Iraqi security source close to the government told The National on Tuesday that the truce “is still holding” despite the attacks and that the unannounced cessation of hostilities “will continue for three months- until the first week of May.”

Kataib Hezbollah, one of Iraq's most powerful armed groups, denied responsibility for the first attack, only hours after a statement published on Telegram claimed it was resuming its attacks on US targets.

“There was no central decision from the militias’ leadership to carry out the attack on the US base,” the Iraqi source added. “It was most likely the work of individuals within the militias who decided to attack.”

The armed factions are split on their position on the truce, explained the source, describing the situation within the militias as “chaotic”.

Militant groups in Iraq and Syria have attacked US troops as part of a co-ordinated front since the outbreak of Israel's war in Gaza – where health authorities say more than 33,000 people have been killed by Israeli fire – demanding an immediate ceasefire in the Palestinian territory run by their ally Hamas.

A screengrab from a video shared on April 20, 2024, shows damage following a bombing overnight on an Iraqi military base, which houses pro-Iranian forces, in Babil province. AFP
A screengrab from a video shared on April 20, 2024, shows damage following a bombing overnight on an Iraqi military base, which houses pro-Iranian forces, in Babil province. AFP

The cessation of attacks against US forces followed a January attack that killed three US soldiers at the Jordanian-Syrian border. Washington attributed it to the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, the Iran-backed group of militias that includes Kataib Hezbollah.

Since then, indirect talks between the US and Iran have attempted to build on the unannounced truce in Iraq to expand it across conflict-hit areas of the Middle East, sources have said.

US troops withdrawal

A Shiite legislator close to the armed factions confirmed on Tuesday that there were divisions between these groups over resuming attacks against the US troops in Iraq and Syria.

“Some of the factions, including Kataib Hezbollah, are pushing for cancelling the truce because of what they consider as procrastination from the Americans and the weak [Iraqi] government position in discussions over US troops withdrawal,” he told The National.

He added that the topic of the US forces' withdrawal had not been on the agenda of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudan’s visit to Washington this month, further irritating these groups, but emphasised that “the truce is still in place and there are no indications at this point of its collapse”.

The Iraqi Prime Minister visited Washington last week on a trip he said would open “a new chapter” in bilateral ties as Baghdad pushes the US to withdraw its troops.

US strikes against the militias on Iraqi territory since the outbreak of the war in Gaza on October 7 have piled pressure on the government in Baghdad to respond to long-standing calls for American-led forces to leave the country. About 2,500 US troops are stationed in Iraq as part of an international coalition against ISIS.

On January 27, Iraq and the US held the first round of talks to end the coalition's mission. Baghdad expects discussions to lead to a timetable for reducing the coalition's presence and reaching bilateral security agreements with partners.

A source close to the Iran-backed groups said that the recent attacks against the US forces were a “warning” by some armed factions who “aren’t satisfied with what the PM brought back from Washington”.

“There is no specific date or timetable related to the exit of the coalition forces led by the Americans, which is one of the basic demands of the factions,” added the source.

A member of Iraq's Popular Mobilisation Forces stands guard at the gate of the paramilitary forces' headquarters, in January. AFP
A member of Iraq's Popular Mobilisation Forces stands guard at the gate of the paramilitary forces' headquarters, in January. AFP

The attacks on US forces came at a time of high tension between Iran and Israel.

Israel carried out a military strike against Iranian territory on Friday, less than a week after Tehran's rocket and drone barrage retaliation for an Israeli attack on its Damascus embassy.

These are the latest escalations stoking fears of a regional war.

The US received notice of the Israeli strike but did not endorse the operation or play any part in it, NBC and CNN reported, quoting a number of sources and a US official.

While you're here ...

Damien McElroy: What happens to Brexit?

Con Coughlin: Could the virus break the EU?

Andrea Matteo Fontana: Europe to emerge stronger

Tips for taking the metro

- set out well ahead of time

- make sure you have at least Dh15 on you Nol card, as there could be big queues for top-up machines

- enter the right cabin. The train may be too busy to move between carriages once you're on

- don't carry too much luggage and tuck it under a seat to make room for fellow passengers

Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer

Cryopreservation: A timeline
  1. Keyhole surgery under general anaesthetic
  2. Ovarian tissue surgically removed
  3. Tissue processed in a high-tech facility
  4. Tissue re-implanted at a time of the patient’s choosing
  5. Full hormone production regained within 4-6 months
Updated: April 24, 2024, 11:00 AM