Belgian football player Jean-Marc Bosman, centre, flanked by his two lawyers, after the European Court of Justice ruled in 1995 that the transfer system of players between football clubs was illegal. AFP
Belgian football player Jean-Marc Bosman, centre, flanked by his two lawyers, after the European Court of Justice ruled in 1995 that the transfer system of players between football clubs was illegal. AFP
Belgian football player Jean-Marc Bosman, centre, flanked by his two lawyers, after the European Court of Justice ruled in 1995 that the transfer system of players between football clubs was illegal. AFP
Belgian football player Jean-Marc Bosman, centre, flanked by his two lawyers, after the European Court of Justice ruled in 1995 that the transfer system of players between football clubs was illegal.

Jean-Marc Bosman: small-time pro who changed football and its finance forever


  • English
  • Arabic

Everyone in European football should know his name, yet few of them would know where he lives or recognise him in the street.

Twenty years ago next week, Jean-Marc Bosman, a little-known midfielder from the smaller of two clubs in a small Belgian city, won a landmark legal battle that gave players greater rights to switch teams. It ultimately led to Real Madrid, Barcelona and Manchester United assembling rosters of talent from across the globe with pin-ups such as David Beckham, Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi on contracts worth millions.

“My name is Bosman but even if I’m not remembered, the Bosman ruling will be remembered,” says the former player, now 51. “It’s the case of the century.”

The Belgian and his lawyers are as pivotal to the wealth of European football stars as the media tycoon Rupert Murdoch and his accountants. Along with the 1990s explosion in television revenue, the Bosman ruling unleashed a boom that transformed the sport into what it is today, a competition between the super-rich on the field as well as off it.

It all came about after Royal Football Club de Liege, Bosman’s club, refused to allow him to join USL Dunkerque in France without a fee once his contract had expired. Bosman embarked on years of court battles that ended with a ruling at the European Court of Justice that not only gave players across the continent free agency, but also tore up domestic restrictions on the number of foreigners in a team.

Bosman became to European football what Curt Flood is to American baseball after his stand-off led to free agency. Football professionals changing clubs after their contracts were finished were said to be going “on a Bosman” – a free transfer.

There are other similarities: rather than revelling in riches, both also ended up with relative rags.

After burning through the 16 million Belgian francs (about Dh1.7m at the time) compensation he won from the national football association in 1998, Bosman had little to fall back on. There were no fast cars and sponsorship deals that made players household names off the pitch. For the Belgian, it was a legal bill, state handouts and a life that unravelled into a battle with addiction.

“In the world of football, I was no longer welcome,” he says. “I won the right for the free circulation of players. I didn’t get many thank yous.”

The case took more than five years to progress, during which time Bosman was “stymied” from playing during his late 20s, typically the peak of a football player’s career, according to Daniel Geey, a partner at the sports-law firm Sheridans.

“It came as a large shock to national and international governing bodies that EU courts were willing to impose fundamental freedom principles, that a club couldn’t stop a player from moving,” says Mr Geey. “It seems quite straight-forward now but it wasn’t then. He gambled away his career.”

The repercussions went beyond Europe as far away as Brazil, the South American nation that has traded more players around the world than any other, and the ruling led to a “revolution”, according to Marcos Motta, a sports lawyer.

There were other less fortunate consequences of the Bosman ruling. Some great winners from history have been left a shadow of their former selves.

Teams such as Ajax, the Amsterdam club that competed for top honours until the European court upended the sport, have fallen a long way behind the game’s richest. The last of its four European Cups came in 1995, the same year Bosman won his case. What followed was an exodus of top talent as the richest teams stockpiled the best players.

“In the end, it led to instability in football,” says Raffaele Poli, the co-founder and head of the Swiss CIES Football Observatory.

The ruling coincided with a nascent boom in European football, with money from broadcasters helping to transform the sport from the dark days of 1980s hooliganism and crumbling stadiums.

The continent’s most lucrative competition, the English Premier League, will begin a new £5.1 billion (Dh28.43bn) three-year domestic TV contract next season and is home to most of the best-paid football players on the planet. As well as attracting the best players from across Europe, provincial teams such as West Bromwich Albion can call upon Venezuelan strikers, midfielders from Benin and defenders from Costa Rica.

Without Bosman, there would be no US$5bn-a-year transfer market. And it is a far cry from when players from different parts of Britain were considered exotic, according to the former England national team coach Graham Taylor.

“I remember we signed a couple of players from Scotland and it was like a big thing,” Mr Taylor recalls of his own playing career in the 1960s.

“At the end of the day football is a worldwide game.”

business@thenational.ae

Follow The National's Business section on Twitter

CABINET%20OF%20CURIOSITIES%20EPISODE%201%3A%20LOT%2036
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EDirector%3A%20%3C%2Fstrong%3EGuillermo%20del%20Toro%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EStars%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Tim%20Blake%20Nelson%2C%20Sebastian%20Roche%2C%20Elpidia%20Carrillo%3Cbr%3ERating%3A%204%2F5%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer

3%20Body%20Problem
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ECreators%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20David%20Benioff%2C%20D%20B%20Weiss%2C%20Alexander%20Woo%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStarring%3A%20%3C%2Fstrong%3EBenedict%20Wong%2C%20Jess%20Hong%2C%20Jovan%20Adepo%2C%20Eiza%20Gonzalez%2C%20John%20Bradley%2C%20Alex%20Sharp%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ERating%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%203%2F5%3C%2Fp%3E%0A