Australia's election a boon for domestic fossil fuel industry

The country's power producers aim to invest an estimated $17 billion needed for new power supply

A tractor makes its way over a pile of coal at a coal port in Gladstone, Queensland. Increasing energy costs influenced voters at the polls. Reuters

Australia's re-elected Prime Minister Scott Morrison once brandished a lump of coal in parliament, crying, "This is coal - don't be afraid!" His surprise win in what some dubbed the 'climate election' may have stunned the country, but voters should know what comes next in energy policy - big coal.

Battered by extended droughts, damaging floods, and more bushfires, Australian voters had been expected to hand a mandate to the Labour party to pursue its ambitious targets for renewable energy and carbon emissions cuts.

Instead, Saturday's election left them on course to re-elect the Liberal-led centre-right coalition headed by Morrison, a devout Pentecostal churchgoer who thanked fellow worshipers for his win at a Sydney church early on Sunday.

The same coalition government last year scrapped a bipartisan national energy plan and dumped then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull because he was viewed as anti-coal.

Power companies and big energy users, who last year rallied behind the national energy plan to end a decade of policy flip-flops, said on Sunday they wanted to work with the coalition anew to find ways to cut energy bills and boost power and gas supply.

"We just need this chaotic environment to stop and give us some real direction," said Andrew Richards, chief executive of the Energy Users Association of Australia, which represents many of the country's largest industrial energy users.

The country's power producers - led by AGL Energy, Origin Energy and EnergyAustralia, owned by Hong Kong's CLP Holdings - want the government to set long-term goals to give them the confidence to invest an estimated $17 billion needed for new power supply.

"Customers are looking to energy companies and the government to get bills down and secure our energy supplies," said EnergyAustralia managing director Catherine Tanna.

"We have an opportunity now to reset our relationships and recommit to working toward a clear, stable and long-term energy policy," she said in comments emailed to Reuters after Saturday's election.

At Origin Energy, chief executive Frank Calabria said in emailed comments he would be looking for appropriate policy that would allow the company to invest in a pumped hydro project and gas exploration in the Northern Territory.

Australia has endured years of divisive debate on energy policy, with attacks by the Liberal-led coalition on Labour's "carbon tax" policy helping to bring down the government of then-leader Julia Gillard in 2013.

Despite top companies, from global miner BHP Group to Australia's biggest independent gas producer Woodside Petroleum, calling for the country to put a price on carbon emissions, the Liberal-led coalition killed the carbon price mechanism in 2014.

Its own attempts to fashion a bipartisan national energy policy foundered amid fierce opposition from coal supporters and climate sceptics on its right-wing.

We just need this chaotic environment to stop and give us some real direction.

Its policy now is focused on driving down power prices and beefing up power supply. For the moment that includes underwriting one new coal-fired power plant and providing A$1.38bn toward a A$4bn energy storage expansion at state-owned hydropower scheme Snowy Hydro, designed to back up wind and solar power.

While the coalition stuck to an official target to cut carbon emissions by 26-28 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030, the United Nations warned last year Australia was unlikely to meet this goal.

The opposition Labour party campaigned on more aggressive targets, aiming to cut carbon emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 and reach 50 per cent renewable power by 2030. The re-elected Liberal-led coalition has no renewable energy target beyond 2020.

In the election, stopping a coal mine in the northern state of Queensland proposed by Indian conglomerate Adani Enterprises was the catchword for inner-city voters in the south pressing for tough action on climate change.

Labour, torn between its traditional union base and its urban environmentally conscious supporters, made no commitments on the Adani mine. The move backfired in the mining heartland of Queensland, where voters with jobs in mind handed the Liberal-led coalition crucial seats in the election.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, left

Adani's mining chief Lucas Dow was not available on Sunday to comment on whether the election outcome might speed up approvals for the long delayed mine.

"There is now a clear mandate for resources projects that have lawful approvals to proceed, such as the Adani coal mine," the Minerals Council of Australia's chief executive Tania Constable said in a statement on Sunday.

Energy users and the power industry, however, see the transition to cleaner energy as inevitable, with states pushing ambitious targets out of line with the national government.

At the same time, Australia, the world's second-largest exporter of coal for power, faces falling demand for coal as its biggest customers - Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan and India - are shifting towards cleaner energy, said Tim Buckley, a director at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.

"I would expect the coalition to fight a rearguard action that will slow the transition, but they can't stall it," he said.