Syria's 'dangerous' chemical weapon sites need securing now, leading experts warn

'Serious concerns' remain over unaccounted stockpiles, according to Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons

A UN expert collects samples in the Ghouta suburb of Damascus in 2013, during an investigation into a suspected chemical weapons attack on the area two weeks earlier. AFP

Live updates: Follow the latest on Syria

A team of international chemical weapons experts should be sent to Syria “as soon as possible", a leading analyst on the weapons of mass destruction has said, amid fears ousted dictator Bashar Al Assad had secretly built up stockpiles.

On Monday, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) said there remained "serious concerns" about "the fate of significant amounts of chemical weapons unaccounted for" and that "the Syrian declaration of its chemical weapons programme still cannot be considered as accurate and complete".

France and the US separately raised similar concerns on Saturday, as Hayat Tahrir Al Sham, a organisation formerly linked to Al Qaeda, and allied militant groups advanced towards the Syrian capital Damascus. Robert Wood, the US deputy ambassador to the UN, said Mr Al Assad's chemical weapons were "not a relic of the past".

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a leading expert on chemical weapons, on Monday told The National efforts to secure and destroy suspected toxic agents should not be delayed.

“We need to get the experts into Syria as soon as possible to verify destruction and to secure those which still exist,” said Mr de Bretton-Gordon, who led investigations into chemical weapons use in Syria and has advised the UK government on the toxins.

An OPCW statement said it was "closely monitoring" information about "the security and integrity of declared chemical weapons research, development, production, storage and testing sites".

Anti-government fighters stand guard outside the Baath Party’s office in Damascus on Monday, after rebels had taken control of the Syrian capital. AFP

Syria promised to give up its chemical weapons after international experts said the Assad regime had fired sarin nerve gas rockets into the Ghouta area near Damascus in August 2013, with estimates of the death toll ranging from about 300 to 1,700. The following month, Damascus agreed to join the Chemical Weapons Convention and to hand over its stockpiles for destruction under the supervision of the OPCW.

Sarin, a liquid dispersed as vapour, kills by disrupting the nervous system, causing fatal seizures and an agonising death. It has been used by terrorists before, in 1995, when an extremist cult dropped a small amount on the Tokyo subway in 1995, killing 13 people and injuring 1,000, but scientists say it is difficult to weaponise without significant expertise.

Experts say Syria has used chemical weapons throughout the civil war that began in 2011 – more than 300 times by some counts, including nine suspected attacks – after agreeing to destroy them. Syria was previously accused of having VX, the world’s most lethal nerve agent, after inspectors found traces of the chemical at a site that had not been declared. VX is 100 times deadlier than sarin and can kill with a tiny amount on the skin.

The OPCW has repeatedly expressed concerns that Syria retained significant quantities of chemical weapons, or continued research on them covertly. On Friday, two days before Mr Al Assad fled Damascus, it said there were “outstanding issues related to potentially undeclared full-scale development and production of chemical weapons at two declared chemical weapons-related facilities, which were previously declared as having never been in operation".

In a previous report in June, the watchdog warned of “undeclared research; the production or weaponisation of unknown quantities of chemical weapons; and significant quantities of chemical-warfare agents, precursors or chemical munitions whose fate has not yet been fully verified by the OPCW”.

Smoke rises in the aftermath of suspected Israeli strikes near Mezzeh Airbase in Damascus. Getty Images

Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar at the weekend said its military had carried out strikes on suspected chemical weapons sites in Syria. “We attacked strategic weapons systems, for example, remaining chemical weapons ... in order that they will not fall in the hands of extremists,” he said.

Burning chemical weapons

It is not yet clear whether such strikes – on Khalkhakah Airbase and a scientific research centre in Damascus so far – might affect nearby populations if the targets were indeed chemical weapons sites. Israeli special forces, according to multiple accounts, raided Masyaf in September, one of the regime’s critical weapon research sites, in an apparent attempt to destroy underground infrastructure.

“The best way to get rid of them is for an OPCW team to go in and remove them to be destroyed elsewhere but if that is not possible, blowing them up is viable to destroy them, " Mr de-Bretton Gordon said.

“There is a danger of spreading contamination but [it is] fairly small, especially if there are large explosions and fires. Fires will incinerate the chemical weapon, which is how we would destroy them anyway.”

An image allegedly shows Israeli strikes on the Masyaf area last night which killed 14 people and wounded 43 others.The image was widely shared on social media platforms but has not been verified. Photo: X

Syria’s deadliest chemical weapons are what experts refer to as “binary”, meaning their constituent parts are stored separately and usually mixed as the weapon is in flight. This is because nerve agents such as sarin last only weeks or months when prepared for use – after that they can become corrosive, difficult to store and lose potency.

“If there's binary components to sarin, one of them is extremely flammable. Biggest risk, to me, is loss of information to be exploited from the sites,” says Dan Kaszeta, an expert on chemical weapon proliferation who has worked with the US government.

“Bear in mind, we're at a point where Israel can say ‘oh, look a CW site’ and bomb anything. So we have to exercise a bit of rigour on these claims.”

If Israel has struck ready-to-use nerve agents, the risk to civilian populations could be much higher than if binary weapons are struck and burnt up. In 2022, scientists at the University of Texas completed decades of research into Gulf War Syndrome, a collection of symptoms in veterans from the 1991 Gulf War in Kuwait and Iraq.

About 100,000 US and British veterans reported “fatigue, persistent headaches, muscle pain, confusion and even difficulty speaking”, for years after the conflict. Robert Haley, one of the researchers into the syndrome, said his team believed coalition bombing of Saddam Hussein's sarin gas stockpiles had caused the mysterious illness, with minuscule amounts of vapour from the strikes travelling thousands of kilometres.