'Dramatic' global rise in laws defending rights of nature

A new movement is defending natural resources by granting rivers, lakes and reefs the right to exist and flourish

This undated handout photo received on April 6, 2020 from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University, shows an aerial survey of coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Australia's Great Barrier Reef has suffered its most widespread coral bleaching on record, scientists said on April 7, 2020 in a dire warning about the threat posed by climate change to the world's largest living organism. James Cook University professor Terry Hughes said a comprehensive survey last month found record sea temperatures had caused the third mass bleaching of the 2,300-kilometre (1,400-mile) reef system in just five years.
 - TO BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR AFP STORY AUSTRALIA-ENVIRONMENT-CLIMATE-REEF
RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO / JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY" - NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS - DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS - NO ARCHIVE

 / AFP / JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA / Handout / TO BE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR AFP STORY AUSTRALIA-ENVIRONMENT-CLIMATE-REEF
RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - MANDATORY CREDIT "AFP PHOTO / JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY" - NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS - DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS - NO ARCHIVE
Powered by automated translation

From Bolivia to New Zealand, rivers and ecosystems in at least 14 countries have won the legal right to exist and flourish, as a new way of safeguarding nature gains steam, US environmental groups said on Thursday.

Rights of nature laws, allowing residents to sue over harm on behalf of lakes and reefs, have seen "a dramatic increase" in the last dozen years, said the Earth Law Centre, International Rivers and the Cyrus R Vance Centre for International Justice.

"This is a new area of rights, but it's also a growing movement," Monti Aguirre, Latin America co-ordinator with International Rivers, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

World leaders held the United Nations' first biodiversity summit on Wednesday to build support for a new agreement to protect 30 per cent of the planet's land and seas by 2030, set to be negotiated in China next May.

Separately, more than 60 leaders signed a Pledge for Nature on Monday committing to reverse global loss of biodiversity by 2030, including clamping down on marine pollution and deforestation.

Without action, 30 per cent to 50 per cent of all species could be lost by 2050, threatening economic and social prosperity, a report by The Nature Conservancy charity said this month.

Lawmakers have been implementing rights of nature, which are rooted in indigenous thought, through laws, judicial decisions, constitutional amendments and United Nations resolutions in countries including Ecuador, Bangladesh, Uganda and Australia.

"We see these efforts not as isolated events, but part of something larger," Simon Davis-Cohen, a researcher with the Community Environmental Legal Defence Fund, a US nonprofit which supports the global growth of rights of nature laws.

This new legal route to protect the planet – overriding the long-held human right to harm – bring fresh arguments to court, rally communities and shift local politics, he said.

Mr Davis-Cohen criticised Thursday's report for failing to focus on the need to empower local authorities, saying strengthening local decision-making was "instrumental" to achieving stronger environmental law.

That question of local decision-making is playing out in Florida, which "has suffered greatly from the failure of our regulatory system to protect our waterways," said Chuck O'Neal, president of the advocacy group Speak Up Wekiva, named after a local river.

Several Florida counties are seeking to recognise rights of nature, and residents of one of the largest, Orange County, will vote in a local referendum on the issue in November.

If passed, the law would recognise that all waterbodies in Orange County have a right to exist, flow and maintain a healthy ecosystem, and enable residents to sue over these issues.

Yet the effort is already in court, after the state government in June barred local jurisdictions from recognising rights of nature, prompting Mr O'Neal and others to sue.

A decision is expected after the November 3 presidential election, said Mr O'Neal.