ABU DHABI // Personal connections, known locally as wasta, should not be used to secure permits to perform Haj, the Federal National Council heard.
Applications by some Emiratis were rejected with “no good reason” given, according to one member, who said wasta has been used too often to get permission to visit Mecca.
The debate at a late-night Ramadan session on Tuesday came at a time when the Haj process is undergoing change, as Saudi Arabia attempts to deal with millions of pilgrims every year.
Dubai representative Marwan bin Ghalita questioned the head of the General Authority for Islamic Affairs & Endowments and raised complaints from constituents whose applications were rejected.
“Some people have used wasta to get their applications approved,” Mr bin Ghalita said.
“I received calls from people who applied to perform Haj the first time, but their applications were rejected. Yet others have been going every year to Haj and they were still approved.”
Dr Mohammed Al Kaabi, the head of the authority, told members this year priority was given to first-time pilgrims.
A new electronic system is being used to handle applications, he said. The quota was also expanded to allow 6,228 to perform the pilgrimage this year, up from 4,631 last year.
Mr bin Ghalita said about twice as many women are allowed to travel as men, but families are often not able to go together.
“Today most people go for Haj as a family, so they should be linked in the system,” he said.
The electronic system still needs to be monitored, he said. “I hope there won’t be unfair special treatment for certain people.”
Dr Al Kaabi said the system will soon ensure that people cannot go several years in a row. His department has started receiving applications for Haj 2018 and 2019. About 40,000 people from the UAE applied to perform the pilgrimage, but the UAE quota this year is just more than 6,000.
In April, authorities said expats in the UAE would no longer be able to apply for places from this country, in line with a request from Saudi authorities.
hdajani@thenational.ae
RESULT
Norway 1 Spain 1
Norway: King (90 4')
Spain: Niguez (47')
The five pillars of Islam
Profile
Company name: Marefa Digital
Based: Dubai Multi Commodities Centre
Number of employees: seven
Sector: e-learning
Funding stage: Pre-seed funding of Dh1.5m in 2017 and an initial seed round of Dh2m in 2019
Investors: Friends and family
From Zero
Artist: Linkin Park
Label: Warner Records
Number of tracks: 11
Rating: 4/5
List of UAE medal winners
Gold
Faisal Al Ketbi (Open weight and 94kg)
Talib Al Kirbi (69kg)
Omar Al Fadhli (56kg)
Silver
Zayed Al Kaabi (94kg)
Khalfan Belhol (85kg)
Zayed Al Mansoori (62kg)
Mouza Al Shamsi (49kg women)
Bronze
Yahia Mansour Al Hammadi (Open and 94kg)
Saood Al Hammadi (77kg)
Said Al Mazroui (62kg)
Obaid Al Nuaimi (56kg)
Bashayer Al Matrooshi (62kg women)
Reem Abdulkareem (45kg women)
The specs
Engine: 77.4kW all-wheel-drive dual motor
Power: 320bhp
Torque: 605Nm
Transmission: Single-speed automatic
Price: From Dh219,000
On sale: Now
Abu Dhabi GP weekend schedule
Friday
First practice, 1pm
Second practice, 5pm
Saturday
Final practice, 2pm
Qualifying, 5pm
Sunday
Etihad Airways Abu Dhabi Grand Prix (55 laps), 5.10pm
Why it pays to compare
A comparison of sending Dh20,000 from the UAE using two different routes at the same time - the first direct from a UAE bank to a bank in Germany, and the second from the same UAE bank via an online platform to Germany - found key differences in cost and speed. The transfers were both initiated on January 30.
Route 1: bank transfer
The UAE bank charged Dh152.25 for the Dh20,000 transfer. On top of that, their exchange rate margin added a difference of around Dh415, compared with the mid-market rate.
Total cost: Dh567.25 - around 2.9 per cent of the total amount
Total received: €4,670.30
Route 2: online platform
The UAE bank’s charge for sending Dh20,000 to a UK dirham-denominated account was Dh2.10. The exchange rate margin cost was Dh60, plus a Dh12 fee.
Total cost: Dh74.10, around 0.4 per cent of the transaction
Total received: €4,756
The UAE bank transfer was far quicker – around two to three working days, while the online platform took around four to five days, but was considerably cheaper. In the online platform transfer, the funds were also exposed to currency risk during the period it took for them to arrive.