Kamal Singh and Richard D'Souza represent a group of investors that lost US$15 million in a real estate scam. Navin Khianey for The National
Kamal Singh and Richard D'Souza represent a group of investors that lost US$15 million in a real estate scam. Navin Khianey for The National
Kamal Singh and Richard D'Souza represent a group of investors that lost US$15 million in a real estate scam. Navin Khianey for The National
Kamal Singh and Richard D'Souza represent a group of investors that lost US$15 million in a real estate scam. Navin Khianey for The National

Scammed UAE investors demand answers over Bar Works scam


Nick Webster
  • English
  • Arabic

Investors who pumped millions of dirhams into a business start-up in New York are demanding answers from the brokers who sold them the deals.

As The National reported last week, hundreds of people in the UAE were promised up to 125 per cent returns on their investments into hot-desking firm Bar Works, that transformed old restaurants and bars into office space.

Units were sold for $30,000 each in the US, and for $10,000 in Istanbul. When it emerged the mastermind behind the scheme was rogue businessman Renwick Haddow, it was revealed the project was in fact a $40 million (Dh147 million) Ponzi scheme and doomed to failure.

Hundreds of units were sold in the UAE, from the offices of Square Yards – a real estate firm selling Dubai property to rich investors in India, Singapore and Hong Kong.

___________________

Read more:

How the Bar Works mastermind made a career of duping investors

___________________

Those who have now lost their life savings are demanding answers as to how much the brokers knew about Bar Works and its shady operator behind the scenes.

One of the investors who lost $150,000 said he was contacted by the Square Yards chief executive in May, warning him there may be issues with future payments he was owed.

Investors were given the names of Bar Works relationship managers who were dealing with their portfolios, but now they are unsure if those names were real, or just convenient pseudonyms.

“I was given so many names,” said Mr Singh, who bought nine units in Istanbul in March, two months after Haddow’s involvement in Bar Works became public knowledge.

“Jonathan Black, Franklin Kinard,Julian Tzanev, Sam Aura, Graham Edwards, and Jessica Mayo – now I realise they were all likely false names to entice us in to hand over our money.”

Black is understood to be the alias used by Haddow, and the signatory on many of the investment contracts.

When they complained to Square Yards, they received a reply from the CEO’s office inviting them to join a class action lawsuit against Bar Works, but lawyers would be charging $650 an hour for their services.

_______________

Read more:

UAE Bar Works agent quit after 'realising what they were asking us to sell'

______________

Square Yards told investors they were only made aware of the FBI investigation into Bar Works at the end of June, just weeks before Haddow was arrested in Tangiers.

In an email to investors, Square Yards CEO Tanuj Shori told them his staff were fully complying with the FBI investigation.

“Recent news concerning Barworks, Inc.(sic) has made us increasingly concerned that representations made by that company were not true, and in fact, may well have been fraudulent,” the email from CEO Tanuj Shori said.

“We ourselves are shocked at these revelations and have been coordinating and communicating with a large number of people to come up with a way forward for our investors.

“We intend to be in contact with the Securities and Exchange Commission to fully cooperate and assist with their investigation.

“Our hope is that, if there are any Barworks assets available, the SEC will collect them into a fund for the benefit of all investors to share equally and that is one significant reason why we will be cooperating with the SEC.

“While we are hopeful that SEC will be able to ferret out any available assets that can be recovered for the Barworks investors, we are also aiding our investors by retaining an independent investigator to search for useful information about Barworks and its owners as well as assets that may be recoverable.

“We will share the information uncovered by the investigator with SEC and, if the SEC deems it appropriate, we will share that information with you as well.

“We have also learned that at least two civil lawsuits have been filed in US courts against Barworks on behalf of Barworks investors.”

Square Yards told investors that Zoe Miller and Jonathan Black - who identified themselves as founders of Bar Works, may have misrepresented their identities.

Zoe Miller’s true identity is believed to be Zoia Kyselova, a close associate of Renwick Haddow, they said.

The brokers also confirmed Jonathan Black is a fictitious person and probably an assumed identity for Haddow.

Samuel Aura, who identified himself to be senior member and equity holder in Bar Works, claimed he was only a master agent and never an employee or shareholder, Square Yards said.

The brokers said Bar Works had not been paying the assured rental to their investors as agreed under their contract.

Haddow was arrested in Morocco and could face up to 40 years in prison if convicted.

Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer

Labour dispute

The insured employee may still file an ILOE claim even if a labour dispute is ongoing post termination, but the insurer may suspend or reject payment, until the courts resolve the dispute, especially if the reason for termination is contested. The outcome of the labour court proceedings can directly affect eligibility.


- Abdullah Ishnaneh, Partner, BSA Law