'Genius' move: What are the goals of the three US crypto bills?

With the Genius Act signed, America is positioning itself to be the global leader in digital assets

US President Donald Trump holds the signed Genius Act at the White House in Washington. Reuters

US President Donald Trump has signed the Genius Act into law, setting the stage for greater cryptocurrency supervision in line with America's aim to be the global leader in digital assets.

The bipartisan bill is one of three that had both Capitol Hill and crypto enthusiasts buzzing, as it would set the US up for the future of finance, while also being a legacy move for Mr Trump, who has gone from crypto sceptic to champion.

“The Genius Act could become a defining milestone for stablecoin policy. Moving stablecoins out of regulatory ambiguity won’t just enable institutional participation, it will require it,” said Omar Elassar, managing director of venture capital firm Animoca Brands Middle East.

The National reported that cryptocurrencies will not become mainstream unless the acts enforce strong regulations. We take a look at the three acts and how they would redefine cryptocurrency regulation and its future.

Genius Act: 'Long overdue'

According to the White House, the Genius Act – formally the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act – is meant to make America “the undisputed leader in digital assets”.

The “long-overdue” law is intended to prioritise consumer protection and strengthen the US dollar’s reserve currency status, in addition to improving national security, which is one of the Trump administration's pillars.

US stablecoin legislation could be a watershed moment for crypto

01:53

Also, the Genius Act is aimed at bringing “massive” investment and innovation to the US, the world's top economy – although the latter is being challenged by others, most notably by rival China.

The bill details strict regulations for stablecoins, which aim to address cryptocurrencies' shortcomings by pegging their value to a unit of an underlying asset, are often issued on faster blockchains and backed by state-issued tender such as the dollar, pound, euro and highly liquid reserves including government treasuries or commodities such as precious metals.

Also, a stablecoin is different from a central bank digital currency, or CBDC: the former is privately issued, while the latter is government-backed. Both, however, aim to make transactions faster, cheaper and more secure, and would serve emerging markets well.

The Genius Act will usher in the creation of the first-federal regulatory system for stablecoins. It also requires 100 per cent reserve backing with liquid assets like the dollar or short-term Treasuries and mandates issuers to make monthly, public disclosures.

Should a stablecoin issuer become insolvent, the Genius Act will prioritises stablecoin holders’ claims over all other creditors, it added.

“The passage of the Genius Act is a true watershed moment for the US. It is a defining step for responsible crypto policy … giving issuers, builders, and regulators the clear rules they have been asking for,” said Ji-Hun Kim, president of the Washington-based Crypto Council for Innovation.

All said, the Genius Act aims to ensure the greenback remains the world's reserve currency, help fight illicit activity in the crypto world and make the US the global leader for digital assets.

Clarity Act: Dual supervision

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, or Clarity Act, meanwhile, aims to establish a regulatory framework for digital commodities – namely, the classification, offering, trading and supervision of digital assets.

It will also define clear lines of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, two of the top US asset regulators that have been monitoring the digital asset situation and cracked down on crime – most notably the case involving jailed FTX boss Sam Bankman-Fried.

Binance CEO: 'UAE at forefront of crypto adoption'

01:57

That means it is expected to be a strict law because, “at its core, it introduces a dual-agency approach to oversight”, said Jerry Huang, an associate at Canadian law firm McMillan.

The Clarity Act calls for how digital assets may be offered, sold and traded in the US, and the registration of brokers, dealers and trading facilities, who must maintain fair trading and anti-manipulation systems, ensure real-time transparency and adopt anti-money laundering and know-your-customer programmes.

These would help reduce “legal uncertainty for issuers, developers and intermediaries, while strengthening investor protections and market integrity”, Mr Huang added.

Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act: 'Weapon' control

The summary of the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act is to “amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy and for other purposes”.

In other words, a CBDC carries the risk of the government being able to surveil people's financial transactions and “suppress politically unpopular activity”, said Congressman Tom Emmer, the bill's main author, who also noted that a CBDC is “is government-controlled, programmable money”.

“For years, we have worked to educate our colleagues on the dangers of this insidious technology, which would undermine our values and destroy Americans’ right to privacy. Now, we must codify [CBDC] to ensure that the United States’ digital currency policy remains in the hands of the American people.

The bill aims to prevent future administrations from weaponising CBDC technology against the American people, he said.

The American Bankers Association agreed in a letter to Mr Emmer, saying that a CBDC “is unnecessary in the US and would present unacceptable risks and costs to the financial system”.

Are these bills bulletproof?

Whether these three legislations work as they are intended to do so remains to be seen, especially as digital assets remain vulnerable to misuse and are being used in illegal activity – a lot.

In 2024, more than 99 per cent of stablecoin volume was legitimate – but stablecoins accounted for about 60 per cent of illicit transaction across the crypto ecosystem, according to an analysis from blockchain platform TRM Labs.

“Their speed, liquidity, and perceived stability can make them attractive for ransomware payments, terrorist financing, romance and investment scams, sanctions evasion, over-the-counter fraud and large-scale laundering,” said Ari Redbord, a vice president at San Francisco-based TRM.

That corroborates an earlier report from Chainalysis, which found out that 63 per cent of all illicit transaction volumes involve stablecoins.

“The integration of stablecoins into traditional finance creates new systemic risk vectors that extend beyond individual protocols or platforms,” analysts at New York-based Chainalysis said.

“A failure of a major stablecoin could trigger cascading liquidations across interconnected protocols, potentially freezing large portions of the DeFi [decentralised finance] ecosystem.”