UK banks bail out when it comes to complaints


  • English
  • Arabic

The customer is always right, but try telling that to the banks. They don't want to know. Now, the regulator is trying to shame them into lifting their game Been to your BMW garage lately? At the one in Chelmsford in Essex, the sales representatives are helpful, friendly and polite. They aim for "10 out of 10" in customer service, according to the posters displayed around the showroom. They are not far off the mark, and when the bill comes, you can still smile.

The Chelmsford car dealership is not alone in the UK. Supermarket chains, landscape gardeners, the little corner shops - they are all doing their best to please the customer. If there is one thing that should benefit in the downturn, it is customer service. It is a simple logic that somehow has escaped the banks. About 7,000 complaints are lodged against the banks every day, according to the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the UK's financial regulator. In the first six months of this year, the banks received 1.3 million complaints, mainly for substandard service and poor advice on insurance and mortgages. And what do the banks do? They drag the issue for months until the customer gives up, or worse, they simply ignore them.

This is the first time the FSA has forced banks to reveal the number of complaints made against them in an effort to improve customer service. It is as damning as an earlier "name and shame" list published by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), the independent watchdog. Lloyds Banking Group takes top spot on both lists. But based on complaint per customer, Barclays takes the cake, with the FSA report showing 250,667 gripes, about 1.19 per cent of its 21 million UK customers.

Lloyds received 288,717 complaints, about 0.96 per cent of its 30 million customers. Still, this is the bank 41 per cent owned by the taxpayers who bailed it out at a cost of £17 billion (Dh98.78bn) two years ago. A bit of gratitude would not go amiss. Just as ungrateful is the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), another state-backed bank, with 1.07 per cent of its 15.5 million UK customers making a complaint. This is followed by Santander, with grievances from 1.02 per cent of its 25 million customers.

The FOS also upheld more complaints against Barclays than any of its rivals: a whopping 61 per cent compared with 50 per cent against RBS and 45 per cent against Lloyds. The industry average is 44 per cent. So what must a customer with a serious, legitimate complaint do to get the bank's immediate attention? You could play the bank at its own game by robbing it. But you would end up in jail, for although it is legal for banks to fleece its customers, it is not for private citizens. You could defile its building, like the farmer who sprayed two Natwest bank branches with manure and won £300,000 in an out-of-court settlement in 2000. But this is a rather messy and smelly exercise.

There are easier and less violent ways. One is to write to a newspaper - preferably a national with a good consumer rights column that could shame the bank into accepting and redressing its errors, sometimes even with a goodwill gift. Another effective way is to take your complaint to the chief executive. Check out the website ceoemail.com for their email addresses. But really, a lot of anger and heartache could be spared if banks put customers before bottom lines and bonuses.

Both the FAS and FOS lists were meant to shame the banks into doing just that. The financial regulator in fact has backed it up with a recent rule that companies with more than 500 complaints over a six-month period must publish them on their own website. The FOS threat of public exposure for better service has failed. The FSA tactic appears to go down the same path, with media reports that these companies are hiding complaints data deep in their websites.

Perhaps it is the money-grabbing nature of the industry that makes it difficult for it to change. The much-dreaded double-dip recession might succeed where regulations fail to humble the banks. By then, perhaps BMW and other businesses that have adapted to the hard times will have diversified into banking, taking their happy customers with them. business@thenational.ae

Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer

Infiniti QX80 specs

Engine: twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V6

Power: 450hp

Torque: 700Nm

Price: From Dh450,000, Autograph model from Dh510,000

Available: Now

Kandahar%20
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EDirector%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Ric%20Roman%20Waugh%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStars%3A%C2%A0%3C%2Fstrong%3EGerard%20Butler%2C%20Navid%20Negahban%2C%20Ali%20Fazal%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ERating%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%202.5%2F5%3C%2Fp%3E%0A