Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Tehran. The head of Britain's counter extremism unit said it was in the 'national interest' to proscribe them as a terror group. WANA
Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Tehran. The head of Britain's counter extremism unit said it was in the 'national interest' to proscribe them as a terror group. WANA
Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Tehran. The head of Britain's counter extremism unit said it was in the 'national interest' to proscribe them as a terror group. WANA
Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Tehran. The head of Britain's counter extremism unit said it was in the 'national interest' to proscribe them as a terror group. WANA

Counter extremism chief says in Britain's 'national interest' to label IRGC terrorists


Thomas Harding
  • English
  • Arabic

The head of Britain’s counter extremism unit has criticised the government for going against the UK “national interest” by failing to label the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp a terrorist organisation.

In light of the IRGC’s support for Hamas and its atrocities in Israel, Robin Simcox said it was “unsustainable” for the British government not to proscribe the outfit.

In his first major speech as the head of the Commission for Countering Extremism, Mr Simcox was outspoken on the need to designate the IRGC, following the US lead in 2019.

“Who government does and does not proscribe is not down to me,” he said in a speech at the Rusi think-tank. “But from a counter extremism perspective, I believe it is in the national interest.”

The IRGC had “operated like a terrorist organisation ever since its inception” in 1979, providing support to other extremist groups “while plotting acts of violence around the world itself”.

He highlighted Iran’s malign influence in Britain which has seen “15 credible threats” to kill or kidnap individuals in Britain since last year. But it was still legal for the IRGC to be “hosted in UK institutions,” said Mr Simcox, a former think-tank director.

“That was highly unsatisfactory before,” he said. “It is surely unsustainable now.”

Robin Simcox, head of the Commission for Countering Extremism, said the IRGC had 'operated like a terrorist organisation ever since its inception'. Photo: Counter Extremism Group
Robin Simcox, head of the Commission for Countering Extremism, said the IRGC had 'operated like a terrorist organisation ever since its inception'. Photo: Counter Extremism Group

Security Minister Tom Tugendhat avoided supporting Mr Simcox’s position and rejected his claim that Britain was a “permissive environment” for anti-Semitism.

But Mr Tugendhat admitted that the Tehran regime had “been attempting to attack targets of Israeli or Jewish importance” in Britain and that “we have been fighting them here”.

According to the Home Office, Mr Simcox’s official role is to “provide the government with impartial, expert advice” as well as the policies “needed to tackle extremism”.

Mr Simcox, who has testified to the US Congress about ISIS and al-Qaeda, went on to state that “one of Hamas’s key backers” for cash and arms was Iran.

“But what is underappreciated is the scale of Iranian-backed activity in this country; and the extent to which Iran attempts to stoke extremism here,” he said.

Iran and the IRGC had also trained the Russians to use their Shahed drones to kill Ukrainians and bombing technology to target British soldiers during the war in Iraq.

It had temporarily stopped the Iran International television chancel from broadcasting in Britain after MI5 discovered credible threats to staff.

“Iran looks to spread its influence in the UK via sermons delivered by receptive clerics; television channels; schools and educational institutes; donations to UK universities; or online disinformation campaigns,” he added.

Furthermore, organisations with Iranian links made it “a religious obligation” for Shia Muslims inside and outside Iran to “display obedience to the Supreme Leader”.

He also touched on the extreme right and left wings in Britain, stating that the former was “fractured, divided, incoherent, and chaotic” and politically discredited.

However, he warned of a “vulnerability” in which the hard right “grasps on to certain issues which are of mainstream concern, filters them through an extremist lens, toxifies them”.

Key findings
  • Over a period of seven years, a team of scientists analysed dietary data from 50,000 North American adults.
  • Eating one or two meals a day was associated with a relative decrease in BMI, compared with three meals. Snacks count as a meal. Likewise, participants who ate more than three meals a day experienced an increase in BMI: the more meals a day, the greater the increase. 
  • People who ate breakfast experienced a relative decrease in their BMI compared with “breakfast-skippers”. 
  • Those who turned the eating day on its head to make breakfast the biggest meal of the day, did even better. 
  • But scrapping dinner altogether gave the best results. The study found that the BMI of subjects who had a long overnight fast (of 18 hours or more) decreased when compared even with those who had a medium overnight fast, of between 12 and 17 hours.
How it works

Each player begins with one of the great empires of history, from Julius Caesar's Rome to Ramses of Egypt, spread over Europe and the Middle East.

Round by round, the player expands their empire. The more land they have, the more money they can take from their coffers for each go.

As unruled land and soldiers are acquired, players must feed them. When a player comes up against land held by another army, they can choose to battle for supremacy.

A dice-based battle system is used and players can get the edge on their enemy with by deploying a renowned hero on the battlefield.

Players that lose battles and land will find their coffers dwindle and troops go hungry. The end goal? Global domination of course.

The%20Kitchen
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EDirector%3A%C2%A0%3C%2Fstrong%3EDaniel%20Kaluuya%2C%20Kibwe%20Tavares%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStars%3A%C2%A0%3C%2Fstrong%3EKane%20Robinson%2C%20Jedaiah%20Bannerman%2C%20Hope%20Ikpoku%20Jnr%2C%20Fiona%20Marr%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ERating%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%203%2F5%C2%A0%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
Tamkeen's offering
  • Option 1: 70% in year 1, 50% in year 2, 30% in year 3
  • Option 2: 50% across three years
  • Option 3: 30% across five years 
Nepotism is the name of the game

Salman Khan’s father, Salim Khan, is one of Bollywood’s most legendary screenwriters. Through his partnership with co-writer Javed Akhtar, Salim is credited with having paved the path for the Indian film industry’s blockbuster format in the 1970s. Something his son now rules the roost of. More importantly, the Salim-Javed duo also created the persona of the “angry young man” for Bollywood megastar Amitabh Bachchan in the 1970s, reflecting the angst of the average Indian. In choosing to be the ordinary man’s “hero” as opposed to a thespian in new Bollywood, Salman Khan remains tightly linked to his father’s oeuvre. Thanks dad. 

Types of bank fraud

1) Phishing

Fraudsters send an unsolicited email that appears to be from a financial institution or online retailer. The hoax email requests that you provide sensitive information, often by clicking on to a link leading to a fake website.

2) Smishing

The SMS equivalent of phishing. Fraudsters falsify the telephone number through “text spoofing,” so that it appears to be a genuine text from the bank.

3) Vishing

The telephone equivalent of phishing and smishing. Fraudsters may pose as bank staff, police or government officials. They may persuade the consumer to transfer money or divulge personal information.

4) SIM swap

Fraudsters duplicate the SIM of your mobile number without your knowledge or authorisation, allowing them to conduct financial transactions with your bank.

5) Identity theft

Someone illegally obtains your confidential information, through various ways, such as theft of your wallet, bank and utility bill statements, computer intrusion and social networks.

6) Prize scams

Fraudsters claiming to be authorised representatives from well-known organisations (such as Etisalat, du, Dubai Shopping Festival, Expo2020, Lulu Hypermarket etc) contact victims to tell them they have won a cash prize and request them to share confidential banking details to transfer the prize money.

Updated: October 19, 2023, 4:25 PM