Pentagon: Kabul drone attack inquiry could lead to disciplinary action

Strike that killed 10 civilians in Kabul has reignited debate on the use of drones

A destroyed vehicle is seen inside a house after a US drone strike in Kabul. AP Photo

Debris of a vehicle inside a house compound after a US drone strike in Kabul. AP Photo

Afghans gather at the scene of a drone attack in Kabul. AP Photo

A military official said the strike hit a vehicle and caused 'significant secondary explosions'. EPA

US officials said the strike targeted a vehicle carrying ISIS suicide bombers heading for Kabul airport. EPA

People gather at the scene of an attack near Hamid Karzai International Airport. EPA

The strike is the second carried out by US forces in Afghanistan since an ISIS bombing killed scores in Kabul on August 26, 2021. Reuters

US military personnel could face disciplinary action following a drone strike in Kabul last week that killed 10 civilians, including seven children, the Pentagon said on Monday.

Zamairi Ahmadi, an employee of an American humanitarian organisation, was among those killed, along with several other employees of international groups and their children.

We now know that there was no connection between Mr Ahmadi and ISIS-Khorasan, that his activities on that day were completely harmless

Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin

All of the victims had applied to be flown out of the country at Kabul airport, just three kilometres from where the air strike occurred.

At the time, an international evacuation effort was flying more than 70,000 thousand Afghan allies and foreign nationals out of the country.

President Joe Biden has said that he would support a full inquiry into the strike, after he was briefed on the details.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said that any move to punish those held responsible would follow a review of the first assessment by the US Air Force, which will be conducted by Centcom, the general headquarters of US forces in the Middle East.

“If there is accountability to be held, the decisions about who and what would be done would be a separate consideration,” he told reporters.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall and Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin discussed how the investigation would proceed on Friday, with possible disciplinary action.

Gen Austin had previously ordered an inquiry into the attack on August 29, which the Pentagon initially said had destroyed a car bomb driven by ISIS-Khorasan fighters, terrorists with the Afghan branch of ISIS.

The US military was scrambling to react to intelligence that IS-K was planning another attack in Kabul, aimed at the international evacuation effort.

David Lavery and his wife Junping Zhang-Lavery, before boarding the plane out of Kabul.

People make their way on board the C-17 plane at Kabul Airport.

David Lavery, who operates Raven Rae Consultancy, a private security company in Kabul, spent weeks helping to organise a safe passage out of the country for hundreds trying to flee.

During those few weeks, Mr Lavery says he survived on about two hours of sleep a night, lost 8kg and was left battered and bruised by the ordeal.

People wait outside the airport in Kabul, Afghanistan.

The couple on board the plane which landed in Germany on August 26.

Mr avery's wife, Junping Zhang-Lavery, helped him care for hundreds of people trying to flee Afghanistan.

Mr Lavery and his team helped guide refugees to the airport.

In late July he was given a list of more than 1,000 applicants trying to seek refuge in Germany and Canada as concern started to grow for the rapid advancement of the Taliban regime.

On August 26, an ISIS car bomb ripped through crowds at the gates of Kabul airport, more than 170 Afghan civilians and at least 13 US soldiers.

“We are confident we successfully hit the target," said Capt Bill Urban of US Central Command following the drone strike.

"Secondary explosions from the vehicle indicated the presence of a substantial amount of explosive material."

But reports that civilians had been killed emerged in the hours following the bombing. On Sunday, the Pentagon admitted what it said was a "tragic mistake."

Initial investigation

The US Air Force claimed that drone operators mistook water containers being loaded on to the back of a Toyota Corolla for drums filled with explosives.

In the Air Force account, the civilian car, which was tracked for eight hours, had been close to a house where it was believed an ISIS-K operative worked.

What the US initially called “secondary explosions” – purported evidence of a car bomb – turned out to be an exploding propane tank stored at the targeted property.

"We now know that there was no connection between Mr Ahmadi and ISIS-Khorasan, that his activities on that day were completely harmless and not at all related to the imminent threat we believed we faced,” Gen Austin said.

"We apologise, and we will endeavour to learn from this horrible mistake."

Mr Biden's support for the investigation could mark a departure from the Trump administration's heavy reliance on using unmanned aerial vehicles for targeting terrorists.

But Mr Biden is unlikely to depart significantly from the controversial counterterrorism tactic.

The Trump administration launched 2,243 drone strikes in the first two years of Mr Trump's time in office, compared to 1,878 for the duration of Barack Obama's presidency, when Mr Biden was vice president, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a UK-based think tank.