Nicolas Anelka slots home his and Chelsea's second goal during their win at Blackburn Rovers.
Nicolas Anelka slots home his and Chelsea's second goal during their win at Blackburn Rovers.
Nicolas Anelka slots home his and Chelsea's second goal during their win at Blackburn Rovers.
Nicolas Anelka slots home his and Chelsea's second goal during their win at Blackburn Rovers.

Nasri full of confidence


  • English
  • Arabic

LONDON // Samir Nasri has warned Chelsea and Liverpool to look over their shoulders after Arsenal demonstrated that they have the quality to challenge for the title this season. The Gunners had been written off as contenders after a surprise loss to Stoke, but Arsene Wenger's men hit back in style as they stunned the champions Manchester United 2-1 at the Emirates Stadium on Saturday.

Nasri was the difference between the two sides as he scored both goals and he said: "Mentally we proved a point by winning. We know the title can be won by the games against the top four. We have shown we can do it and the most important thing is to keep going. "We are back in it, but we always thought we were involved, even before this game. We know our quality, our strengths and know what we are capable of. We can definitely win the title this season."

The United keeper Edwin Van der Sar said he was not worried that his team had only taken one point from their games against the top three clubs this season. Defeats against Liverpool and Arsenal and a draw against Chelsea have left United eight points behind the leaders at the top of the table. The Dutch keeper said: "I am not concerned about our results against the top teams. We have been unlucky in all three games. We have played all three away now. They all have to come to Old Trafford, so we have to make sure we get maximum points.

"It was a chance to get a psychological blow over one of our rivals. If we had beaten them, or even drawn, we would have kept them below us. Now we have let them back in." sports@thenational.ae

While you're here
Chatham House Rule

A mark of Chatham House’s influence 100 years on since its founding,  was Moscow’s formal declaration last month that it was an “undesirable
organisation”. 

 

The depth of knowledge and academics that it drew on
following the Ukraine invasion had broadcast Mr Putin’s chicanery.  

 

The institute is more used to accommodating world leaders,
with Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher among those helping it provide
authoritative commentary on world events. 

 

Chatham House was formally founded as the Royal Institute of
International Affairs following the peace conferences of World War One. Its
founder, Lionel Curtis, wanted a more scientific examination of international affairs
with a transparent exchange of information and ideas.  

 

That arena of debate and analysis was enhanced by the “Chatham
House Rule” states that the contents of any meeting can be discussed outside Chatham
House but no mention can be made identifying individuals who commented.  

 

This has enabled some candid exchanges on difficult subjects
allowing a greater degree of free speech from high-ranking figures.  

 

These meetings are highly valued, so much so that
ambassadors reported them in secret diplomatic cables that – when they were
revealed in the Wikileaks reporting – were thus found to have broken the rule. However,
most speeches are held on the record.  

 

Its research and debate has offered fresh ideas to
policymakers enabling them to more coherently address troubling issues from climate
change to health and food security.