UN demands Gaza ceasefire and hostage release but nine countries including US oppose


Adla Massoud
  • English
  • Arabic

Live updates: Follow the latest on Israel-Gaza

The UN General Assembly on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved a Palestinian-led resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the release of all hostages being held there, but nine countries including the US voted against it.

The non-binding resolution demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, as well as the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. It also demanded “immediate access” to widespread humanitarian aid for the citizens of Gaza, especially in the besieged north of the territory.

The resolution gathered 158 votes in favour, with nine countries opposing and 12 abstaining. A similar measure last year gathered 153 votes, showing an increase in support.

The nine nations voting against the ceasefire resolution were the US, Israel, Argentina, Hungary, Paraguay, Tonga, Papua New Guinea, Nauru and the Czech Republic.

“We hope that this very powerful message against only a handful of countries that voted against is another step in the direction of accomplishing the ceasefire in which the entire international community is calling for,” Palestine's UN representative Riyad Mansour told reporters.

In a separate vote, the Assembly passed a resolution urging Israel to uphold the mandate of Palestinian aid agency UNRWA and allow its “safe and unhindered humanitarian assistance” operations.

It repeats UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres’s statements that UNRWA is “the backbone” of all humanitarian operations in Gaza and no organisation can replace it. This follows Israel's decision to ban the agency, a measure due to take effect on January 28, drawing widespread international condemnation including from the Biden administration, a key Israeli ally.

This measure received 159 votes in favour, nine against, and 11 abstentions.

The nine countries opposing the resolution were: Argentina, Israel, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the US.

Speaking before the vote, US deputy ambassador Robert Wood warned member states that at a time when Hamas is feeling isolated due to the ceasefire in Lebanon, the UN resolution did not do enough to ensure the release of hostages.

“It would be shameful and wrong if the General Assembly voted today to vindicate Hamas’s cynical strategy of stalling and obstruction,” he said. “Indeed, rather than relieving pressure on Hamas, the General Assembly should be adopting a resolution that increases pressure on Hamas to accept the deal on the table without condition and without further delays.”

Addressing the separate UNRWA resolution, Mr Wood said it had “serious flaws”. He noted the resolution lacks provisions to restore trust between Israel and the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, despite US-led efforts to propose such measures.

On November 20, Washington exercised its veto power in the Security Council, a move consistent with past actions to protect its ally. The veto blocked a resolution urging a ceasefire in the continuing conflict between Israel and Hamas, which began after the militant group's October 7, 2023 assault on Israel.

The US maintained that any ceasefire must be tied to the release of all hostages.

“Gaza doesn't exist any more. It is destroyed,” Slovenia’s UN representative Samuel Zbogar said. “History is the harshest critic of inaction.”

Mr Zbogar underscored the need for urgent measures to secure a different future for Palestinian children, emphasising that achieving a ceasefire and ending the war in Gaza are critical steps.

Israel, predictably, strongly condemned the ceasefire resolution, which includes a call for Mr Guterres to develop “proposals on how the United Nations could help to advance accountability”.

“By approving this resolution, you are abandoning the hostages and choosing co-operation with Hamas. History will not forget this choice, and neither will we,” said Israel's ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon.

Mr Danon also presented to the 193-member General Assembly dozens of letters that Israel sent to UNRWA and the UN about alleged evidence showing that Hamas had taken over the agency and is operating from within its facilities in Gaza.

Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer

Updated: December 12, 2024, 7:05 AM