AD201010705139948AR
AD201010705139948AR
AD201010705139948AR
AD201010705139948AR

Wall Street banks drawn into broader loans inquiry


  • English
  • Arabic

Two of America's leading newspapers yesterday reported that a criminal investigation had begun into several Wall Street banks over whether they had misled either investors or ratings agencies about mortgage bond deals. The New York Times reported that Andrew Cuomo, the New York attorney general, had begun an investigation into eight banks to determine whether they provided misleading information to agencies that rate mortgage securities.

His office issued subpoenas late on Wednesday notifying the banks of his investigation, the Times reported on its website, citing two people with knowledge of the investigation. According to the report, the targets are Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Credit Agricole and Merrill Lynch, now owned by Bank of America. The inquiry by Mr Cuomo suggests he thinks the rating agencies may have been duped by one or more of the targets of his investigation, the report said.

The Times said spokesmen for Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank declined to comment and other banks did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The companies that rated the mortgage deals were Standard & Poor's, Fitch Ratings and Moody's Investors Service, the report said. Mr Cuomo was also interested in ratings agency employees hired by bank mortgage desks to help create mortgage deals that received better ratings than they deserved, the newspaper reported, citing the sources, who were not authorised to discuss the matter publicly.

Separately, The Wall Street Journal reported that US federal prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) were conducting a preliminary criminal investigation into whether banks misled investors about their participation in mortgage-bond deals. JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, UBS and Citigroup had received civil subpoenas from the SEC, the Journal reported. Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley were already being investigated under similar preliminary criminal scrutiny, the newspaper said.

Wall Street companies are facing scrutiny from prosecutors and politicians over whether they improperly sold collateralised debt obligations linked to the subprime mortgages that caused the credit crisis. Goldman Sachs is contesting a lawsuit from the SEC, which alleges the company misled investors about a mortgage-linked security in 2007. Prosecutors are gathering evidence and have not issued criminal subpoenas or determined the outlines of any potential case, according to the Journal. To win a criminal case, the prosecutors would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a company or its employees intentionally misled investors, it reported.

UBS, Citigroup and Deutsche Bank declined to comment on the report, as did the Manhattan US attorney's office, the SEC and Goldman Sachs, the Journal said. Morgan Stanley told the newspaper it had not been contacted by prosecutors and had done nothing wrong. A spokesman for JPMorgan said the bank "hasn't been contacted" by federal prosecutors and wasn't aware of any criminal investigation. James Gorman, the chief executive of Morgan Stanley, on Wednesday denied allegations the US bank misled investors about mortgage derivatives it sold. The Journal reported the company was being investigated by US prosecutors over whether it misled clients when it sold them collateralised debt obligations as its own traders bet that the value of the securities would drop.

The investigation has stemmed from an ongoing civil fraud investigation of more than a dozen Wall Street companies' mortgage bond businesses by the SEC that began last year, the Journal reported. Mr Cuomo's office is conducting a criminal investigation into some of those companies' activities, it said. Government officials in the US are seeking to assuage public anger over bank bailouts by tightening regulations after the financial crisis. The changes are intended to prevent a repeat of the global downturn that led to US$1.78 trillion (Dh6.53tn) in write-downs and losses by financial firms.

* with Reuters and Bloomberg

Virtual banks explained

What is a virtual bank?

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority defines it as a bank that delivers services through the internet or other electronic channels instead of physical branches. That means not only facilitating payments but accepting deposits and making loans, just like traditional ones. Other terms used interchangeably include digital or digital-only banks or neobanks. By contrast, so-called digital wallets or e-wallets such as Apple Pay, PayPal or Google Pay usually serve as intermediaries between a consumer’s traditional account or credit card and a merchant, usually via a smartphone or computer.

What’s the draw in Asia?

Hundreds of millions of people under-served by traditional institutions, for one thing. In China, India and elsewhere, digital wallets such as Alipay, WeChat Pay and Paytm have already become ubiquitous, offering millions of people an easy way to store and spend their money via mobile phone. Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines are also among the world’s biggest under-banked countries; together they have almost half a billion people.

Is Hong Kong short of banks?

No, but the city is among the most cash-reliant major economies, leaving room for newcomers to disrupt the entrenched industry. Ant Financial, an Alibaba Group Holding affiliate that runs Alipay and MYBank, and Tencent Holdings, the company behind WeBank and WeChat Pay, are among the owners of the eight ventures licensed to create virtual banks in Hong Kong, with operations expected to start as early as the end of the year. 

Liverpool's all-time goalscorers

Ian Rush 346
Roger Hunt 285
Mohamed Salah 250
Gordon Hodgson 241
Billy Liddell 228

Labour dispute

The insured employee may still file an ILOE claim even if a labour dispute is ongoing post termination, but the insurer may suspend or reject payment, until the courts resolve the dispute, especially if the reason for termination is contested. The outcome of the labour court proceedings can directly affect eligibility.


- Abdullah Ishnaneh, Partner, BSA Law