Tesla chief executive Elon Musk gives a statement at the construction site of the Tesla Giga Factory in Gruenheide near Berlin last year. EPA-EFE
Tesla chief executive Elon Musk gives a statement at the construction site of the Tesla Giga Factory in Gruenheide near Berlin last year. EPA-EFE
Tesla chief executive Elon Musk gives a statement at the construction site of the Tesla Giga Factory in Gruenheide near Berlin last year. EPA-EFE
Tesla chief executive Elon Musk gives a statement at the construction site of the Tesla Giga Factory in Gruenheide near Berlin last year. EPA-EFE

Tesla's German car plant attempts to raise manufacturing bar


  • English
  • Arabic

Two years after Elon Musk elicited audible gasps from an awards show audience with his surprise announcement that Tesla would build a factory outside Berlin, the project is nearing fruition and the hype has never been more palpable.

One analyst recently compared the series of innovations Mr Musk is pursuing at the plant to Henry Ford’s revolutionary moving assembly line, while Volkswagen's chief executive this month expressed concern that Tesla will be able to crank out an electric car in a third of the time it is taking his company — a disparity that would jeopardise jobs.

Mr Musk has billed the novelties Tesla is working on as transformative to the structural design of its vehicles. He wants to use massive machines — as long as a semi-trailer and tall as a two-story home — to produce front and rear body parts using single pieces of metal. Pulling this off would save time and cost, reduce weight and improve driving range.

All this buzz will sound familiar to those who followed the launch of the Model 3 a few years back. The perennially promotional Mr Musk touted an effort to build a highly automated “alien dreadnought” manufacturing system that went disastrously awry and nearly bankrupted Tesla. Today, the company has vastly more resources to support its chief executive's desire to push the envelope with regard to how cars are made.

“The big picture here is that Tesla has the opportunity to completely reinvent the car manufacturing process for vehicle production and factories,” Adam Jonas, Morgan Stanley’s top car analyst, wrote in a report last month. “Tesla is building the car factory of the future.”

Mr Musk has summed up Tesla’s pursuit in a simple way, writing on Twitter in January: “With our giant casting machines, we are literally trying to make full-sized cars in the same way that toy cars are made”.

On billboards strewn about Tesla’s factory when it opened to the public for a day last month, Tesla said it would inject aluminium into the world’s largest die-casting machines, which will then clamp the metal using 6,100 tonnes of pressure — a force equivalent to 1,020 African elephants standing on the tool to form parts.

The plant will house eight of these machines, with Mr Musk aiming to eventually stamp out the two biggest parts of its Model Y sport utility vehicles — the front and rear underbodies — with just one piece of metal. The current Model 3, by contrast, comprises 70 metal pieces, just for the rear underbody.

While Mr Musk has used the term “Giga press” for these machines, that suggests Tesla conjured them in-house, this is not the case. The company has been buying them from Idra Group, a closely held Italian company that has sold them to three customers on three continents and is in talks with other car makers and major suppliers.

The front and rear castings will interface with frames beneath Model Ys that will house batteries built into the structure of the vehicle. This, too, could be a step change — Tesla and other EV makers have to this point been housing their batteries in sheet metal, then sealing those coverings to separate floor plans.

Mr Musk touted the ramifications of simpler and more integrated battery and body manufacturing during Tesla’s “Battery Day” event last year. He claimed the company could reduce investment per gigawatt hour of battery output by 55 per cent and shrink the amount of plant-floor space needed by 35 per cent.

For all the upside Mr Musk has described, he has also acknowledged Tesla will be gambling in Gruenheide, a town about an hour’s drive east of the German capital.

“Lot of new technology will happen in Berlin, which means significant production risk,” Mr Musk tweeted in October last year. Tesla’s plants in Shanghai and Fremont, California, will attempt the same transitions in about two years, when the new tech is proven, he wrote at the time.

Germany’s car makers are watching Tesla’s progress closely. VW may build a new EV factory near its sprawling Wolfsburg headquarters in direct response to Mr Musk’s foray.

Earlier this month, VW’s chief executive Herbert Diess sought to rally his workers for the challenge. He warned Tesla may manage to make an EV in just 10 hours, versus the more than 30 hours VW needs at its plant in Zwickau. VW’s new factory would make 250,000 EVs a year and aim to catch up with Tesla on production time.

Morgan Stanley’s Mr Jonas last month increased his forecast for how many cars Tesla will crank out annually by the end of the decade by 2.35 million, citing his expectation that Tesla will produce an average of more than 800,000 vehicles per plant by 2030. That is far greater than the capacity for 500,000 units the company currently claims for its Fremont factory.

“We have yet to see the ‘moving assembly line moment’ in the EV industry,” Mr Jonas wrote, referring to Henry Ford’s 1913 breakthrough. “We believe the time is approaching for that moment. And we believe Tesla is uniquely positioned to push the boundaries at the epicentre of a manufacturing change in auto making.”

BMW's production chief Milan Nedeljkovic told reporters at an event last month that the car maker has not worked with big casting components like Tesla, in part because this would reduce the flexibility it needs to produce several different kinds of models on the same assembly lines. Tesla’s new approaches intrigue him, nonetheless.

“If it works, maybe it’s something we’d consider,” Mr Nedeljkovic said.

THE BIO: Martin Van Almsick

Hometown: Cologne, Germany

Family: Wife Hanan Ahmed and their three children, Marrah (23), Tibijan (19), Amon (13)

Favourite dessert: Umm Ali with dark camel milk chocolate flakes

Favourite hobby: Football

Breakfast routine: a tall glass of camel milk

From Zero

Artist: Linkin Park

Label: Warner Records

Number of tracks: 11

Rating: 4/5

Long read

Mageed Yahia, director of WFP in UAE: Coronavirus knows no borders, and neither should the response

The Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index

The Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index

Mazen Abukhater, principal and actuary at global consultancy Mercer, Middle East, says the company’s Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index - which benchmarks 34 pension schemes across the globe to assess their adequacy, sustainability and integrity - included Saudi Arabia for the first time this year to offer a glimpse into the region.

The index highlighted fundamental issues for all 34 countries, such as a rapid ageing population and a low growth / low interest environment putting pressure on expected returns. It also highlighted the increasing popularity around the world of defined contribution schemes.

“Average life expectancy has been increasing by about three years every 10 years. Someone born in 1947 is expected to live until 85 whereas someone born in 2007 is expected to live to 103,” Mr Abukhater told the Mena Pensions Conference.

“Are our systems equipped to handle these kind of life expectancies in the future? If so many people retire at 60, they are going to be in retirement for 43 years – so we need to adapt our retirement age to our changing life expectancy.”

Saudi Arabia came in the middle of Mercer’s ranking with a score of 58.9. The report said the country's index could be raised by improving the minimum level of support for the poorest aged individuals and increasing the labour force participation rate at older ages as life expectancies rise.

Mr Abukhater said the challenges of an ageing population, increased life expectancy and some individuals relying solely on their government for financial support in their retirement years will put the system under strain.

“To relieve that pressure, governments need to consider whether it is time to switch to a defined contribution scheme so that individuals can supplement their own future with the help of government support,” he said.

Updated: November 19, 2021, 3:30 AM