Michael Lewis’ Flash Boys is a ripping yarn filled with rip-off artists running rampant through American bourses. And we should take heed: Mr Lewis’s 1989 book, Liars’ Poker, a memoir of his beginnings at bond-trader Salomon Brothers during the Reagan era, told us everything we would need to know about the 2008 financial crisis, if only we had listened.
Mr Lewis was starting out at Salomon just as Italian-American trader Lewis Ranieri realised that an awful lot of money could be made out of trading mortgages. Almost every American, Mr Ranieri figured, took out a big loan to cover home ownership, and the total value of this outstanding mortgage debt in 1981 was around one trillion dollars. That was a huge, untapped pool of debt, complete with juicy interest repayments, that could, in principle, be tranched and traded like any other kind of debt product.
Loans from banks to householders could support bonds, with the interest payments from the mortgages hypothecated to form the interest component of the bond. Mr Ranieri saw no reason why an 11 per cent mortgage could not become a 10.5 per cent bond. So he invented a tradeable “mortgage bond” backed by home loans. Mr Ranieri’s next innovation, the Collateralised Mortgage Obligation, which pooled a number of mortgages into a bond with multiple tranches and approximate maturity dates – nowadays renamed the Collateralised Debt Obligation (CDO), and applied to all manner of consumer debt – has haunted the financial pages since 2008.
This period also saw the birth of the now notorious mortgage associations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, alongside their older parent, Ginnie Mae. The latter converted loans of low-income homeowners into bonds, which were then guaranteed by the United States government and packaged with a triple-A rating by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. Fannie and Freddie converted and implicitly guaranteed the rest.
Here is the warning:
“Once the [mortgage] loans were [converted into securities and guaranteed] ... nobody cared about the quality of the loans. Defaulting homeowners became the Government’s problem.”
And here is the punchline:
“A cautious man would have inspected the properties he was lending against, for nothing but property underpinned the loans. But if you planned to run with this new market, you did not have time to check every last property in a package of loans.” Caveat emptor, indeed.
These sentences would not be out of place in a retrospective on the 2008 financial crisis – but they were written in 1989. The two major causes of widespread mispricing in a US$1 trillion dollar industry are there.
First, there was a clear information asymmetry between buyers of mortgage bonds and their sellers.
Second, Fannie and Freddie’s implicit government guarantees gave the assets a triple-A rating irrespective of the creditworthiness of the actual lenders. In 2008, two further sparks were added – a lightly-regulated mortgage sales industry, which led to systematic misselling of mortgages and mispricing of counterparty risk, and the wholesale slicing and dicing of mortgage-backed securities through absurdly complex derivative products: the CDO squared – a CDO built out of tranches of other CDOs – being a particularly mindbending personal favourite.
As global economic interdependence grows, clear, factual, investigative accounts of the real significance of high finance’s activities are more vital than ever. Alan Greenspan, who was the chairman of the Fed as the US’s housing bubble grew, should have put down Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and picked up Liar’s Poker. Washington should now take note of Flash Boys.
abouyamourn@thenational.ae
ANDROID%20VERSION%20NAMES%2C%20IN%20ORDER
%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Alpha%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Beta%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Cupcake%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Donut%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Eclair%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Froyo%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Gingerbread%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Honeycomb%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Ice%20Cream%20Sandwich%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Jelly%20Bean%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20KitKat%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Lollipop%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Marshmallow%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Nougat%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Oreo%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%20Pie%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%2010%20(Quince%20Tart*)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%2011%20(Red%20Velvet%20Cake*)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%2012%20(Snow%20Cone*)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%2013%20(Tiramisu*)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%2014%20(Upside%20Down%20Cake*)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3EAndroid%2015%20(Vanilla%20Ice%20Cream*)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cem%3E*%20internal%20codenames%3C%2Fem%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
Dhadak 2
Director: Shazia Iqbal
Starring: Siddhant Chaturvedi, Triptii Dimri
Rating: 1/5
Cheeseburger%20ingredients
%3Cp%3EPrice%20for%20a%20single%20burger%20%C2%A30.44%3Cbr%3EPrice%20for%20a%20single%20bun%20%C2%A30.17%3Cbr%3EPrice%20for%20a%20single%20cheese%20slice%20%C2%A30.04%3Cbr%3EPrice%20for%2010g%20Gherkins%20is%20less%20than%20%C2%A30.01%3Cbr%3EPrice%20for%2010g%20ketchup%20is%20less%20than%20%C2%A30.01%20%3Cbr%3EPrice%20for%2010g%20mustard%20is%20less%20than%20%C2%A30.01%3Cbr%3EPrice%20for%2010g%20onions%20is%20less%20than%20%C2%A30.01%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3ETotal%2068p%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3ECredit%3A%20Meal%20Delivery%20Experts%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
Results:
6.30pm: Handicap (Turf) | US$175,000 2,410m | Winner: Bin Battuta, Christophe Soumillon (jockey), Saeed bin Suroor (trainer)
7.05pm: UAE 1000 Guineas Trial Conditions (Dirt) | $100,000 | 1,400m | Winner: Al Hayette, Fabrice Veron, Ismail Mohammed
7.40pm: Handicap (T) | $145,000 | 1,000m | Winner: Faatinah, Jim Crowley, David Hayes
8.15pm: Dubawi Stakes Group 3 (D) | $200,000 | 1,200m | Winner: Raven’s Corner, Richard Mullen, Satish Seemar
8.50pm: Singspiel Stakes Group 3 (T) | $200,000 | 1,800m | Winner: Dream Castle, Christophe Soumillon, Saeed bin Suroor
9.25pm: Handicap (T) | $175,000 | 1,400m | Winner: Another Batt, Connor Beasley, George Scott
Mercer, the investment consulting arm of US services company Marsh & McLennan, expects its wealth division to at least double its assets under management (AUM) in the Middle East as wealth in the region continues to grow despite economic headwinds, a company official said.
Mercer Wealth, which globally has $160 billion in AUM, plans to boost its AUM in the region to $2-$3bn in the next 2-3 years from the present $1bn, said Yasir AbuShaban, a Dubai-based principal with Mercer Wealth.
“Within the next two to three years, we are looking at reaching $2 to $3 billion as a conservative estimate and we do see an opportunity to do so,” said Mr AbuShaban.
Mercer does not directly make investments, but allocates clients’ money they have discretion to, to professional asset managers. They also provide advice to clients.
“We have buying power. We can negotiate on their (client’s) behalf with asset managers to provide them lower fees than they otherwise would have to get on their own,” he added.
Mercer Wealth’s clients include sovereign wealth funds, family offices, and insurance companies among others.
From its office in Dubai, Mercer also looks after Africa, India and Turkey, where they also see opportunity for growth.
Wealth creation in Middle East and Africa (MEA) grew 8.5 per cent to $8.1 trillion last year from $7.5tn in 2015, higher than last year’s global average of 6 per cent and the second-highest growth in a region after Asia-Pacific which grew 9.9 per cent, according to consultancy Boston Consulting Group (BCG). In the region, where wealth grew just 1.9 per cent in 2015 compared with 2014, a pickup in oil prices has helped in wealth generation.
BCG is forecasting MEA wealth will rise to $12tn by 2021, growing at an annual average of 8 per cent.
Drivers of wealth generation in the region will be split evenly between new wealth creation and growth of performance of existing assets, according to BCG.
Another general trend in the region is clients’ looking for a comprehensive approach to investing, according to Mr AbuShaban.
“Institutional investors or some of the families are seeing a slowdown in the available capital they have to invest and in that sense they are looking at optimizing the way they manage their portfolios and making sure they are not investing haphazardly and different parts of their investment are working together,” said Mr AbuShaban.
Some clients also have a higher appetite for risk, given the low interest-rate environment that does not provide enough yield for some institutional investors. These clients are keen to invest in illiquid assets, such as private equity and infrastructure.
“What we have seen is a desire for higher returns in what has been a low-return environment specifically in various fixed income or bonds,” he said.
“In this environment, we have seen a de facto increase in the risk that clients are taking in things like illiquid investments, private equity investments, infrastructure and private debt, those kind of investments were higher illiquidity results in incrementally higher returns.”
The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, one of the largest sovereign wealth funds, said in its 2016 report that has gradually increased its exposure in direct private equity and private credit transactions, mainly in Asian markets and especially in China and India. The authority’s private equity department focused on structured equities owing to “their defensive characteristics.”