UK study says far right copies tactics of religious extremists

King’s College London report warns politicians should be concerned about reciprocal radicalisation

epa06369453 (FILE) - British police on dutyl during a vigil for the victims of the London Bridge terror attacks by the City Hall in London, Britain, 05 June 2017, (reissued 05 December 2017). Media reports on 05 December 2017 state that the report by David Anderson QC, a former terrorism law reviewer asked by the British Home Secretary to audit internal MI5 and police reviews, is published on 05 December 2017. The terror attacks in 2017 - at Manchester Arena, London Bridge, Finsbury Park and Westminster - has placed the spotlight on the British security services. The British internal security service MI5 and police launched internal reviews following the atrocities between March and June 2017 and the findings of the reviews looking at intelligence handling by the organisations are to be seen in the review published by the  Home Secretary.  EPA/FACUNDO ARRIZABALAGA *** Local Caption *** 53568746

Extremist groups are at risk of engaging in a cycle of escalatory violence in which religious extremists and the far right embrace "the same tools and tactics", a study by UK radicalisation experts said.

Far-right groups, it said, have increasingly mimicked religious extremists’ methods and stolen their tactics.

Researchers from the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence at King's College London examined the concept of reciprocal radicalisation, which sees extremist groups feed off each other.

The report said it would be a mistake to treat the threats separately.

"Policymakers have reason to be concerned that the co‑presence of far‑right and radical Islamist groups could aggravate social cleavages and lead to an escalation in violence or rhetoric from one or both groups," said the report, titled Innovation, Creativity and the Interplay Between Far‑right and Islamist Extremism.

“Unfortunately, there is no clear‑cut ‘escalation ladder’ that would help policymakers and practitioners determine the likelihood of spiralling violence and tailor their interventions accordingly.

“Policymakers should be aware of the possibility of both reciprocal radicalisation and operational reciprocity between these ideologically opposed movements.

“It is entirely conceivable that far‑right extremists and Islamist extremists might engage in escalatory violence by invoking the threat of the other while simultaneously adopting the most effective tools and tactics employed by their adversary.”

The report said the issue of reciprocal radicalisation was brought to the fore by former prime minister David Cameron in a 2007 speech when he alluded to Islamist extremists as being a “mirror image” of the far‑right British National Party.

“It has been anecdotally established that far‑right extremists have borrowed from the [Islamist] playbook, which would potentially help them increase the efficacy of their tactics – both lethal, eg bomb-making, and non‑lethal, eg social media messaging,” it said.

"In short, were this to be the case, it would be a potentially grave mistake to treat the ... threats in isolation rather than examining how they interact and influence one another."

It said in 2019 the transnational neo‑Nazi group Feuerkrieg Division posted a screengrab from an ISIS bomb-making video on its page on social media site Gab and later a version of the video was also shared on a prominent neo‑Nazi Telegram channel.

Last year, the director‑general of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation said far‑right organisations were using similar social media tactics to those adopted by ISIS for recruitment purposes.

Research by Bridget Johnson also identified variations of the same memes used by both groups and noted they have both produced heavily stylised videos of militant training camps.

The review said researchers need to be “alert” to examples of the groups using one another’s methods and said studies on the interaction between different groups in prisons may be advantageous.

“There is an opportunity, for example, to examine the potential of prison networks to serve as incubators of collaboration or ideological migration between far‑right and Islamist extremists,” it said.

Similarly, it would be worth investigating whether far‑right extremists who later joined religious extremist groups brought any practices or material knowledge with them that, in turn, influenced the innovations of such networks, the report said.

The potential consequences of operational reciprocity between far‑right and religious extremists were concerning, it said.

“As such, scholars within the terrorism studies community should stay alert for any signs of such cross‑ideological knowledge diffusion or collaboration.”

EDITOR'S PICKS
NEWSLETTERS