An American group is helping the Premier League with their reform plans, but not in response to the emergence of the controversial 'Project Big Picture' proposals, according to the Press Association.
The league's strategic review began in February and PA stated the Boston Consulting Group was appointed by the board early on in that process.
The 'Project Big Picture' plans, which were being developed separately to the league's own review, came to light last month and were swiftly rejected by top-flight clubs.
The plans were described as a 'power grab' because they sought to concentrate greater influence over governance matters in the hands of the Premier League's 'Big Six'. Liverpool and Manchester United were heavily involved in the development of the proposals.
The league said in rejecting PBP that the clubs were committed to the strategic review, which would focus on "the future structures and financing of English football".
The report said that a working group comprised of a cross-section of club representatives is developing initial recommendations to put to the clubs at a shareholders' meeting next month.
Those initial recommendations will cover areas such as the competition's structure and whether to stick with 20 clubs or cut to 18 as proposed in PBP. It will also deal with calendar issues like scrapping the League Cup and tackle broadcasting arrangements.
Governance and revenue distribution will then be looked at next year.
PA reported that the league is likely to have publicly abandoned its highly controversial pay-per-view model before November 21, when the Premier League returns after the upcoming international break.
Discussions must be completed with broadcast partners before it can be announce a change of position.
It is understood a return to the approach adopted at the start of the 2020-21 season – when all matches were televised by one of the league's broadcast partners – is the likeliest solution, with the country under new lockdown conditions due to the coronavirus pandemic.
