Itâs that time again. Just before a Cricket World Cup. English cricketâs silly season.
In 2003, it was the â admittedly serious â Zimbabwe issue, where Englandâs administrators hummed and hawed about whether or not they should tour, then left it to the players to decide anyway, and they opted out.
Four years later, Andrew Flintoff felt like he might make a suitable captain for a late-night pedalo expedition in St Lucia. He went overboard, and it was promptly decided he perhaps was not fit to vice-captain the national cricket team, after all.
Most recently, it was the decision to bin Alastair Cook as captain in 2015, and from the squad altogether in fact, right at the last minute.
Four years of âplanningâ thrown out the window more or less just as they were boarding the plane for Australia and New Zealand. No wonder that did not end well.
And no wonder England have never won the World Cup. Or even made a final since 1992. There is something about World Cups that makes them go all giddy, and lose their grip just as it heaves into view.
The 2019 vintage had looked like being above all that. Marching on more or less serenely â the odd bar fight here and there, notwithstanding â under the leadership of a canny and calculating captain, they looked to be eyeing up their home event with justifiable reason for optimism.
And then Alex Hales happened. Hales was deselected on April 29, after English cricketâs powers-that-be decided that he might provide an unwanted distraction from the task in hand. What with him having just served a suspension for recreational drug use and that.
Whatever the whys and wherefores, or right and wrongs of the decision to jettison Hales, it did leave enough time for all that noise to pass before the competition starts.
He was only going to be back up for the starting XI anyway. A world-class substitute, right enough. One who could cover pretty much any position in the batting order. And one with a list of Englandâs individual batting records to his name.
But he still might only have played if someone else needed a rest in a tournament for which just looking at the fixtures schedule is exhausting.
______________
Latest episode of our weekly podcast
______________
So far, so fair. Ditch Hales, OK. But Englandâs biggest decision is still yet to be made.
If they opt to fill that vacant 15th place in their squad with anybody but Jofra Archer when the final list is sent to the ICC on May 23, then it really is the silly season.
Archerâs late run for selection had apparently troubled some of the present incumbents. Chris Woakes, the fast-bowler who would be, when fit, one of the first choice players in the starting XI, put the conundrum succinctly.
âIt probably wouldn't be fair, morally, but at the same time it's the nature of international sport,â Woakes was quoted as saying by the BBC.
Who should replace Alex Hales?
But that moral maze has surely been bypassed by the withdrawal of Hales. It is an open goal. There is one spot left fill. And world cricketâs most exciting emerging talent is sat there saying: "I'm here if you need me."
Surely there is only one answer? So what if he is not a batsman, like Hales.
Of the 15 players England provisionally named there were, itâs fair to say, two spare batsmen â Hales and Joe Denly â and two spare bowlers â two from Tom Curran, David Willey, Liam Plunkett and Mark Wood, depending on what XI they wanted to name.
Bringing Archer in would put the onus entirely onto Denly to fill the void if any batsmen lost form across the duration of the competition, with no other batting reserves.
[ James Vince, or perhaps Ben Duckett or Ben Foakes, might be a like for like substitute for Hales. ]
But Archer now has a series of matches starting against Pakistan on Wednesday, to prove â were it not already clear â that that space should be his.
