Google's headquarters in Mountain View, California. In 2020, Google was targeted alongside Facebook for failing to compensate Australian news organisations for content posted to their platforms. Photo: AP
Google's headquarters in Mountain View, California. In 2020, Google was targeted alongside Facebook for failing to compensate Australian news organisations for content posted to their platforms. Photo: AP
Google's headquarters in Mountain View, California. In 2020, Google was targeted alongside Facebook for failing to compensate Australian news organisations for content posted to their platforms. Photo: AP
Google's headquarters in Mountain View, California. In 2020, Google was targeted alongside Facebook for failing to compensate Australian news organisations for content posted to their platforms. Photo

Google misled consumers about use of location data, Australian court rules


  • English
  • Arabic

Google violated Australian law by misleading users of Android mobile devices about the use of their location data, a court ruled on Friday in a landmark decision against the global digital giant.

The US company faces potential fines of “many millions” of dollars over the case, which was brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the regulators’ chief Rod Sims said.

The federal court found that in 2017 and 2018 Google misled some users of phones and tablets featuring its Android operating system by collecting their personally identifiable location information even when they had opted out of sharing “Location History” data.

It said Google notably failed to make clear that allowing tracking of “web and app activity” under a separate setting on their devices included the location details.

Various studies around the world have documented the problem of location data being gathered through Android and iPhone devices without users’ knowledge or explicit permission.

Such data can be highly valuable to advertisers trying to pitch location-related products and services.

But Mr Sims said Friday’s court decision was “the first ruling of its type in the world in relation to these location data issues”.

“This is an important victory for consumers, especially anyone concerned about their privacy online, as the court’s decision sends a strong message to Google and others that big businesses must not mislead their customers,” he said.

“Today’s decision is an important step to make sure digital platforms are upfront with consumers about what is happening with their data and what they can do to protect it.”

In his ruling, federal court judge Thomas Thawley “partially” accepted the ACCC case against Google, noting that the company’s “conduct would not have misled all reasonable users” of its service.

This is an important victory for consumers, especially anyone concerned about their privacy online, as the court's decision sends a strong message to Google and others that big businesses must not mislead their customers

But he added that Google’s action “misled or was likely to mislead some reasonable users” and that “the number or proportion of reasonable users who were misled, or were likely to have been misled, does not matter” in establishing contraventions of the law.

The ACCC said it would seek “pecuniary penalties” that could amount to US$850,000 per breach, potentially totalling “many millions” of dollars, national broadcaster ABC quoted Mr Sims as saying.

Google protested the ruling, which it noted had rejected some of the ACCC’s “broad claims” against it and concerned only a narrowly defined class of users.

“We disagree with the remaining findings and are currently reviewing our options, including a possible appeal,” a spokesperson said.

“We provide robust controls for location data and are always looking to do more. For example. we recently introduced auto delete options for Location History, making it even easier to control your data,” they said.

Last year, Google was targeted alongside Facebook by the ACCC for failing to compensate Australian news organisations for content posted to their platforms.

The dispute led to landmark legislation requiring digital firms to pay for news and resulted in Google and Facebook signing deals worth millions of dollars to Australian media companies.

Directed by: Craig Gillespie

Starring: Emma Stone, Emma Thompson, Joel Fry

4/5

Cherry

Directed by: Joe and Anthony Russo

Starring: Tom Holland, Ciara Bravo

1/5

Sole survivors
  • Cecelia Crocker was on board Northwest Airlines Flight 255 in 1987 when it crashed in Detroit, killing 154 people, including her parents and brother. The plane had hit a light pole on take off
  • George Lamson Jr, from Minnesota, was on a Galaxy Airlines flight that crashed in Reno in 1985, killing 68 people. His entire seat was launched out of the plane
  • Bahia Bakari, then 12, survived when a Yemenia Airways flight crashed near the Comoros in 2009, killing 152. She was found clinging to wreckage after floating in the ocean for 13 hours.
  • Jim Polehinke was the co-pilot and sole survivor of a 2006 Comair flight that crashed in Lexington, Kentucky, killing 49.