China asks ride-hailing company Didi to delist from US over security fears

Regulators have directed Didi to work out precise details, which include proposals for privatisation or a Hong Kong float

Didi's biggest minority shareholders are Japan's SoftBank and Uber Technologies. AFP

Chinese regulators have asked Didi Global’s top executives to devise a plan to delist from US bourses, people familiar with the matter said, an unprecedented request that’s likely to revive fears about Beijing’s intentions for its giant tech industry.

The country’s tech watchdog wants management to take the company off the New York Stock Exchange because of concerns about leakage of sensitive data, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing a sensitive matter. The Cyberspace Administration of China, the agency responsible for data security in the country, has directed Didi to work out precise details, subject to government approval, it said.

Proposals under consideration include a straight-up privatisation or a share float in Hong Kong, followed by a delisting from the US, the people added. If the privatisation proceeds, the proposal will likely be at least the $14 IPO price since a lower offer so soon after the June initial public offering could prompt lawsuits or shareholder resistance, the people said.

If there is a secondary listing in Hong Kong, the IPO price would probably be a discount to the share price in the US, $8.11 as of Wednesday’s close.

Shares in SoftBank Group, Didi’s biggest minority shareholder, slid more than 5 per cent in Tokyo.

Deliberations continue and it’s possible regulators will backtrack on their request, the people said. Either option would deal a severe blow to a ride-hailing giant that pulled off the largest US IPO by a Chinese firm since Alibaba Group Holding’s in 2014. Representatives for Didi and the CAC didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Didi sparked the ire of Beijing when it proceeded with its New York stock offering this summer, despite regulatory requests that it ensure the security of its data before the IPO. Chinese regulators quickly launched multiple investigations into the company and have considered a range of unprecedented penalties, Bloomberg News reported in July.

It’s possible that the delisting would be part of a package of punishments for Didi. Beijing’s municipal government has proposed an investment in the company that would give state-run firms effective control, Bloomberg News reported in September. Such an investment could help Didi finance the repurchase of its US-traded shares.

Didi is currently controlled by the management team of co-founder Cheng Wei and president Jean Liu, which received aggregate voting power of 58 per cent after the company’s US initial public offering. SoftBank and Uber Technologies are Didi’s biggest minority shareholders.

Even if Didi shifts its listing to Hong Kong, it will have to address the data security concerns that have drawn regulatory scrutiny. The company may have to give up control of its data to a third-party – again undercutting its price tag.

Didi's withdrawal from US bourses could stoke fears of an exodus of Chinese firms. Reuters

Regulators have weighed a delisting for Didi since the summer, after the world’s largest ride-hailing company infuriated officials by ploughing ahead with its US IPO, Bloomberg News has reported.

A withdrawal from US bourses could stoke fears of an exodus of Chinese firms as Washington and Beijing quarrel about access to listed firms’ books. On Thursday, a senior Chinese regulatory official said such delistings would be a setback for relations with the US, while offering broad support for Hong Kong as an alternative venue.

Didi – once feted for defeating Uber in China – has now become a test case for a broader Chinese government effort to curb the power of internet titans. Xi Jinping’s administration, keen to promote his vision of sharing the wealth or “common prosperity,” has targeted an internet sector that’s accumulated vast wealth by operating on the periphery of the law, minted an unprecedented number of billionaires and enriched local and foreign investors in the process.

A state-directed privatisation would be unprecedented for a private firm of Didi’s stature and send a signal to American investors, long accustomed to investing freely in China’s largest corporations from Alibaba to Baidu and JD.com.