Former Bank of England governor Sir Mark Carney said the government was “working at cross purposes with the bank", after its tax-cutting mini-budget unleashed turmoil in the markets. PA
Former Bank of England governor Sir Mark Carney said the government was “working at cross purposes with the bank", after its tax-cutting mini-budget unleashed turmoil in the markets. PA
Former Bank of England governor Sir Mark Carney said the government was “working at cross purposes with the bank", after its tax-cutting mini-budget unleashed turmoil in the markets. PA
Former Bank of England governor Sir Mark Carney said the government was “working at cross purposes with the bank", after its tax-cutting mini-budget unleashed turmoil in the markets. PA

UK government is 'undercutting' economic institutions, ex-Bank of England governor says


Gillian Duncan
  • English
  • Arabic

Former Bank of England governor Sir Mark Carney on Thursday warned the UK government against undermining the country’s economic institutions.

Sir Mark said the new government was “working at cross purposes with the bank", after Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng’s tax-cutting mini-budget unleashed turmoil in the markets.

“There was an undercutting of some of the institutions that underpin the overall approach — so not having an Office for Budget Responsibility forecast is much-commented upon,” Sir Mark told BBC Radio 4.

“Unfortunately, having a partial budget in these circumstances — a tough global economy, tough financial market position, working at cross purposes with the bank — has led to quite dramatic moves in financial markets.”

The mini-budget, or so-called “fiscal event,” which was announced on Friday, represented the country's largest tax cuts in 50 years. It included the abolishment of the top rate of tax for its biggest earners.

Sir Mark, who served as the central's bank governor 2013 to 2020, said the government made the mistake of leaving out the “real measures” that would drive the acceleration of growth in the economy. He said these were necessary for the numbers to add up.

“And so that leads to one last uncertainty and concern, which is maybe the way the numbers are going to add up is through spending cuts, as yet unspecified,” he said. “What would those be and how are those going to be put in place?”

On Monday, the pound fell to its lowest level against the dollar ― only $1.03.

On Wednesday, the Bank of England was forced to intervene to buy up gilts — UK government debt in sterling ― after it “warned of a material risk to UK financial stability”.

The bank was forced to act after plunging markets for UK debt sent borrowing costs soaring and forced pension funds to dump their assets because they did not have enough short-term cash to honour some contracts.

Sir Mark praised the bank for stepping in to avert a pensions crisis cascading through market.

“If the bank had done nothing, we would have had further moves up in government bond yields and potentially some of these pension funds unable to make short term obligations, and the knock-on effects that were beginning to show up,” he said.

“That would more than ripple, it would cascade through financial markets.

“It is complicated. But the core thing here is the bank acted, the bank was able to act because it has that structure and it rightly stepped in at the point where the system was about to not function.”

The turbulence continued on Thursday, as the pound slid in early deals as low as $1.0763 following the Bank of England intervention.

“The message of financial markets is that there is a limit to unfunded spending and unfunded tax cuts in this environment,” Sir Mark said. “And the price of those is much higher borrowing costs for the government and for mortgage holders and borrowers up and down the country.”

His comments are the latest in a wave of international criticism and warnings about the government’s fiscal plans, including from the International Monetary Fund and ratings firm Moody’s.

The IMF on Tuesday said it was “closely monitoring” developments and urged Mr Kwarteng to “re-evaluate” his tax measures. It said, in an extraordinary statement, that the plans would increase inequality.

Meanwhile, Moody's said Britain's new fiscal policy regime was “credit negative”. It said a sustained confidence shock could permanently weaken the UK's debt affordability.

The government has, however, dismissed criticism about its financial plans.

Chris Philp, Britain's chief secretary to the Treasury, said he disagreed with concerns raised by the IMF.

“I saw the IMF comments. I respectfully disagree,” he told Sky News.

Mr Philp also said the government would stick to its plan to hold a bigger fiscal announcement on November 23.

Meanwhile, World Bank president David Malpass on Wednesday warned that it could take years for global energy production to diversify away from Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. This would prolong the risk of stagflation, or a period of low growth and high inflation, he said.

In a speech at Stanford University in California, Mr Malpass said there was an increased likelihood of recession in Europe. He said China's growth was slowing sharply and US economic output had contracted in the first half of the year.

Those developments would have grave consequences for developing countries, Mr Malpass said, citing what he called “consequential” and “worsening” challenges facing development.

Addressing the current “perfect storm” of rising interest rates, high inflation and slowing growth required new macro and microeconomic approaches, Mr Malpass said. He said these would include better targeted spending and clearly messaged efforts to increase supplies.

Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer

Who's who in Yemen conflict

Houthis: Iran-backed rebels who occupy Sanaa and run unrecognised government

Yemeni government: Exiled government in Aden led by eight-member Presidential Leadership Council

Southern Transitional Council: Faction in Yemeni government that seeks autonomy for the south

Habrish 'rebels': Tribal-backed forces feuding with STC over control of oil in government territory

How%20to%20avoid%20getting%20scammed
%3Cul%3E%0A%3Cli%3ENever%20click%20on%20links%20provided%20via%20app%20or%20SMS%2C%20even%20if%20they%20seem%20to%20come%20from%20authorised%20senders%20at%20first%20glance%3C%2Fli%3E%0A%3Cli%3EAlways%20double-check%20the%20authenticity%20of%20websites%3C%2Fli%3E%0A%3Cli%3EEnable%20Two-Factor%20Authentication%20(2FA)%20for%20all%20your%20working%20and%20personal%20services%3C%2Fli%3E%0A%3Cli%3EOnly%20use%20official%20links%20published%20by%20the%20respective%20entity%3C%2Fli%3E%0A%3Cli%3EDouble-check%20the%20web%20addresses%20to%20reduce%20exposure%20to%20fake%20sites%20created%20with%20domain%20names%20containing%20spelling%20errors%3C%2Fli%3E%0A%3C%2Ful%3E%0A
Updated: October 03, 2022, 3:14 AM