It was a very Dubai moment, except that it happened in Shanghai. A few years back I was on a rooftop terrace in the heart of China's commercial capital in the company of Sir Rod Eddington, then the chief executive of British Airways.
Rod, an affable host, was expounding on the dynamism of Shanghai's business culture.
Beverage in hand, he swept his arm the length of the vista in front of us, taking in the Huangpu river and the eye-boggling vision of Pudong at night.
When I first came here 20 years ago," he said enthusiastically, "that was all mud flats and old wharves. Now just look."
It was indeed hard to imagine that the high-rise silhouette of concrete, glass and neon had ever been anything other than a modern 21st century skyline, but in fact it had taken the Chinese just two decades to make that transformation.
You get the same kind of reaction from long-term Dubai residents all the time. "When I first came here, that was just desert," they say, pointing to Sheikh Zayed Road, or the Marina, or Emirates Hills.
It illustrates the essential role that property has played and will continue to play in the economic development of both China and Dubai - but only if the business leaders and the authorities in the two countries get it right.
There seems little doubt the Chinese have done exactly that. The country's property sector, which this time last year was in danger of collapsing like a burst balloon, has recovered to the point where developers and financiers are now looking once more to cash in on their investments through initial public offerings (IPOs) on the country's equally buoyant equity markets.
Reports from Hong Kong suggest there will be a flood of IPOs in the Chinese property sector later this year and early next, as property magnates revive deals that were shelved in the financial crisis last year.
According to some estimates, up to US$5 billion (Dh18.36bn) will be raised on the Hong Kong market alone, before taking into account IPOs on the other, more frothy stock market in Shanghai. That is a huge vote of confidence in the long-term prospects for Chinese property.
There are two significant aspects to the reborn Chinese property boom. The first is the presence of big western firms as financial backers of the indigenous developers. International names such as Goldman Sachs and UBS are in the thick of the action, along with a list of private equity investors.
These financiers lent money aggressively to Chinese developers on the basis of soaring land bank valuations before the crisis. But they did not pull out last autumn when those valuations fell sharply, but temporarily. Now they think the time is right to get some return.
The second factor is the role the Chinese government has played in putting the property sector back on track. While the West dithered over financial stimulus packages and quantitative easing measures, Beijing simply poured money directly into the hands of investors and developers through generous bank-lending programmes.
Such are the benefits of the Chinese brand of state-directed totalitarian capitalism.
The UAE, and especially Dubai, can learn much from this approach. The UAE's central bank acted swiftly last autumn when it seemed financial activity was on the verge of freezing up completely, injecting billions into the banking system and agreeing to underwrite deposits.
Proportionate to the size of the country's economy, the UAE's efforts at quantitative easing were more significant than those of the US and most of the European economies.
But the problem since that admirable initiative is that the country's banks have not been passing on the benefits of the stimulus to where it will really have an effect - the UAE's property investors, developers and end users.
A recent report by the ratings agency Moody's Investors Service showed that growth in net loans was just 1.3 per cent so far this year, against an average of 37 per cent over the past five years. The banks are simply not lending fast enough to get the property market back on track.
The other difference between the Chinese and Dubai experiences is the absence of the big western financiers from the UAE property markets. Government restrictions on foreign land ownership made it unattractive for the international property funds and private equity groups to tie up large amounts of capital in UAE land banks.
With limited international interest, it is now difficult to put accurate valuations on land assets as, for example, Dubai Property and Emaar are finding in the negotiations over their planned merger.
The Dubai property authorities should take a leaf from the Chinese book of economics, by directing more of the financial stimulus package at the property sector and opening it up to the rest of the world for investment. That will get this crucial market moving again.
fkane@thenational.ae
The specs
- Engine: 3.9-litre twin-turbo V8
- Power: 640hp
- Torque: 760nm
- On sale: 2026
- Price: Not announced yet
Our legal consultants
Name: Hassan Mohsen Elhais
Position: legal consultant with Al Rowaad Advocates and Legal Consultants.
Final results:
Open men
Australia 94 (4) beat New Zealand 48 (0)
Plate men
England 85 (3) beat India 81 (1)
Open women
Australia 121 (4) beat South Africa 52 (0)
Under 22 men
Australia 68 (2) beat New Zealand 66 (2)
Under 22 women
Australia 92 (3) beat New Zealand 54 (1)
Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026
1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years
If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.
2. E-invoicing in the UAE
Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption.
3. More tax audits
Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks.
4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime
Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.
5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit
There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.
6. Further transfer pricing enforcement
Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes.
7. Limited time periods for audits
Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion.
8. Pillar 2 implementation
Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.
9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services
Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations.
10. Substance and CbC reporting focus
Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity.
Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer
Who are the Sacklers?
The Sackler family is a transatlantic dynasty that owns Purdue Pharma, which manufactures and markets OxyContin, one of the drugs at the centre of America's opioids crisis. The family is well known for their generous philanthropy towards the world's top cultural institutions, including Guggenheim Museum, the National Portrait Gallery, Tate in Britain, Yale University and the Serpentine Gallery, to name a few. Two branches of the family control Purdue Pharma.
Isaac Sackler and Sophie Greenberg were Jewish immigrants who arrived in New York before the First World War. They had three sons. The first, Arthur, died before OxyContin was invented. The second, Mortimer, who died aged 93 in 2010, was a former chief executive of Purdue Pharma. The third, Raymond, died aged 97 in 2017 and was also a former chief executive of Purdue Pharma.
It was Arthur, a psychiatrist and pharmaceutical marketeer, who started the family business dynasty. He and his brothers bought a small company called Purdue Frederick; among their first products were laxatives and prescription earwax remover.
Arthur's branch of the family has not been involved in Purdue for many years and his daughter, Elizabeth, has spoken out against it, saying the company's role in America's drugs crisis is "morally abhorrent".
The lawsuits that were brought by the attorneys general of New York and Massachussetts named eight Sacklers. This includes Kathe, Mortimer, Richard, Jonathan and Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, who are all the children of either Mortimer or Raymond. Then there's Theresa Sackler, who is Mortimer senior's widow; Beverly, Raymond's widow; and David Sackler, Raymond's grandson.
Members of the Sackler family are rarely seen in public.