A Bitcoin artwork in Miami, Florida. Bitcoin is by far the most censorship-resistant of all blockchains. AFP
A Bitcoin artwork in Miami, Florida. Bitcoin is by far the most censorship-resistant of all blockchains. AFP
A Bitcoin artwork in Miami, Florida. Bitcoin is by far the most censorship-resistant of all blockchains. AFP
A Bitcoin artwork in Miami, Florida. Bitcoin is by far the most censorship-resistant of all blockchains. AFP

Why Bitcoin NFTs are raising questions about censorship


  • English
  • Arabic

Bitcoin is not the first blockchain that springs to mind when you think of non-fungible tokens (NFTs); that would be Ethereum.

In the past two weeks, however, NFTs have entered Bitcoin’s orbit, thanks to Ordinals.

This newly launched protocol lets users “inscribe” images on satoshis, the lowest denomination of Bitcoin — images that then live in perpetuity on the eponymous blockchain.

Watch: What is Bitcoin and how did it start?

What happened next should not surprise anyone familiar with Bitcoin’s immutable infrastructure.

With grim inevitability, a user used Ordinals to inscribe an offensive image on the blockchain.

This image — as with all other information on Bitcoin — is inscribed permanently on to satoshis. These images also automatically appear on the Ordinal’s homepage, in this case forcing creator Casey Rodarmor to scramble into action and manually remove the image from the site.

What Mr Rodarmor could never do, though, is permanently remove the image.

As such, this incident — which may seem frivolous and inconsequential to some — has raised serious questions about censorship resistance.

And this is a principle that sits at the very heart of the cryptocurrency industry and certainly at the heart of Bitcoin, which is by far the most censorship-resistant of all chains.

Why care about censorship resistance?

There are mixed views on Bitcoin’s censorship resistance.

Bitcoin proponents contend that it is one of the network’s strongest advantages, an attribute assured by its high level of decentralisation and absolutely critical to the network’s overall health.

Others — including those who long to see stronger regulations brought to the cryptocurrency industry — believe some level of censorship may be required to weed out those using blockchain to launder money, fund illegal enterprises or publish offensive images, for example.

While block explorers can enforce their own moderation policies, users are free to inscribe whatever image they want on to the blockchain.

On the Ordinals scandal, Mr Rodarmor observed: “The inscription is still on the chain and if you run your own copy of Ordinals — which everybody is free to do — it will not have the config file and you will see the [image] if that is what you so desire.”

The question is, should we care about this? If someone elects to spend their own money defacing a satoshi with an offensive image or something worse, does it warrant our concern?

More than that, does it warrant censorship of Bitcoin or any other blockchain?

The cost of financial freedom

To my mind, Bitcoin’s uncensorable, immutable and permissionless nature is one of its greatest strengths as a currency and the Ordinals imbroglio doesn’t relate to currency.

Instead, it relates to everyday users’ “freedom” to add their own non-financial contributions (digital artefacts, etc) to the network.

A use-case that Satoshi Nakamoto, for all his brilliance, could not have foreseen.

There are clearly benefits to some level of censorship when we are discussing Web3 features such as those offered by Ordinals.

I do not think any of us can be blase about the prospect of criminals freely minting, say, NFTs with grim imagery.

We can fiercely oppose such degeneracy while also being ardent supporters of Bitcoin’s transactional immutability.

Currently, Bitcoin’s founding mission as a transparent, independent currency and store of value available to any citizen is under threat.

Cryptocurrencies — in pictures

The preponderance of centralised banks and corporations adding Bitcoin to their portfolio, not to mention offering crypto custody services to money managers, is significantly threatening the network’s decentralisation.

In this use case, centralised censorship is absolutely something to be resisted, and we can be thankful Bitcoin is hard-wired against it.

As the past year has shown, centralisation is not only anathema to the founding principles of the blockchain and cryptocurrency project but in this space, frankly dangerous.

Decentralisation is the only way to ensure the safe growth of a truly censorship-resistant, fully accessible financial ecosystem.

Bitcoin remains the flagship project of this mission, and we shouldn't let an NFT experiment detract from that, regardless of the sensational headlines it attracts.

What we can say in favour of the Ordinals NFT project is that it has brought a new wave of interest to Bitcoin, resulting in an enlarged average block size as more users join the network.

However, while this is a welcome development, we must not forget the founding principles of Bitcoin as a blockchain and currency that can resist censorship and manipulation by central and investment banks, which fiat currencies such as the US dollar cannot.

The future of finance may not be Bitcoin, but it must and will be decentralised and censorship-resistant.

Stefan Rust is the founder of Laguna Labs, a blockchain development house, and former chief executive of bitcoin.com

Mercer, the investment consulting arm of US services company Marsh & McLennan, expects its wealth division to at least double its assets under management (AUM) in the Middle East as wealth in the region continues to grow despite economic headwinds, a company official said.

Mercer Wealth, which globally has $160 billion in AUM, plans to boost its AUM in the region to $2-$3bn in the next 2-3 years from the present $1bn, said Yasir AbuShaban, a Dubai-based principal with Mercer Wealth.

Within the next two to three years, we are looking at reaching $2 to $3 billion as a conservative estimate and we do see an opportunity to do so,” said Mr AbuShaban.

Mercer does not directly make investments, but allocates clients’ money they have discretion to, to professional asset managers. They also provide advice to clients.

“We have buying power. We can negotiate on their (client’s) behalf with asset managers to provide them lower fees than they otherwise would have to get on their own,” he added.

Mercer Wealth’s clients include sovereign wealth funds, family offices, and insurance companies among others.

From its office in Dubai, Mercer also looks after Africa, India and Turkey, where they also see opportunity for growth.

Wealth creation in Middle East and Africa (MEA) grew 8.5 per cent to $8.1 trillion last year from $7.5tn in 2015, higher than last year’s global average of 6 per cent and the second-highest growth in a region after Asia-Pacific which grew 9.9 per cent, according to consultancy Boston Consulting Group (BCG). In the region, where wealth grew just 1.9 per cent in 2015 compared with 2014, a pickup in oil prices has helped in wealth generation.

BCG is forecasting MEA wealth will rise to $12tn by 2021, growing at an annual average of 8 per cent.

Drivers of wealth generation in the region will be split evenly between new wealth creation and growth of performance of existing assets, according to BCG.

Another general trend in the region is clients’ looking for a comprehensive approach to investing, according to Mr AbuShaban.

“Institutional investors or some of the families are seeing a slowdown in the available capital they have to invest and in that sense they are looking at optimizing the way they manage their portfolios and making sure they are not investing haphazardly and different parts of their investment are working together,” said Mr AbuShaban.

Some clients also have a higher appetite for risk, given the low interest-rate environment that does not provide enough yield for some institutional investors. These clients are keen to invest in illiquid assets, such as private equity and infrastructure.

“What we have seen is a desire for higher returns in what has been a low-return environment specifically in various fixed income or bonds,” he said.

“In this environment, we have seen a de facto increase in the risk that clients are taking in things like illiquid investments, private equity investments, infrastructure and private debt, those kind of investments were higher illiquidity results in incrementally higher returns.”

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, one of the largest sovereign wealth funds, said in its 2016 report that has gradually increased its exposure in direct private equity and private credit transactions, mainly in Asian markets and especially in China and India. The authority’s private equity department focused on structured equities owing to “their defensive characteristics.”

Where%20the%20Crawdads%20Sing
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EDirector%3A%20%3C%2Fstrong%3EOlivia%20Newman%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EStars%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Daisy%20Edgar-Jones%2C%20Taylor%20John%20Smith%2C%20Harris%20Dickinson%2C%20David%20Strathairn%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3ERating%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%202%2F5%3C%2Fp%3E%0A

War

Director: Siddharth Anand

Cast: Hrithik Roshan, Tiger Shroff, Ashutosh Rana, Vaani Kapoor

Rating: Two out of five stars 

Updated: February 15, 2023, 4:00 AM