Bond actress Eva Green wins $1m in court battle over film that was never made

French star victorious in lawsuit against production company over science fiction movie A Patriot

Eva Green sued production company White Lantern Films over payment for the failed project

James Bond star Eva Green has emerged victorious in a legal battle over a $1 million (£810,000) acting fee for the never-made science fiction film A Patriot.

The 42-year-old French actress had sued UK-based production company White Lantern Film at the High Court in London for the fee. But it countersued, saying she derailed the £4 million project by making “unreasonable demands”.

Judge Michael Green ruled in Green's favour, finding that she had not breached her contract with the company and was therefore entitled to the fee, and dismissed the counterclaim.

“In particular, I find that Ms Green did not renounce her obligations under the artist agreement; nor did she commit any repudiators breaches of it,” the judge said.

In a 71-page judgment in the actress's favour, the judge highlighted the “overinterpretation” of private messages in the case.

He said both sides accused each other of pretending to be in a position to make the film at the end of September 2019, but neither side was prepared to make the movie the other wanted to make.

He later added that the case has been complicated by convoluted and overtechnical theories as to what happened and the purportedly malign strategies being adopted by the other side at the time.

The case centred on a dispute over the direction of the film, with Green arguing that she was not comfortable with the way the project was being handled by the producers.

Jake Seal, producer of A Patriot. PA

She also accused the producers of cutting corners and not providing her with adequate training for the role.

In his ruling, the judge said that he found Green's evidence to be “credible and reliable” and was satisfied that she had not acted unreasonably in her dealings with the producers.

He also found that the producers had failed to provide her with adequate training for the role, which he said was a “significant breach” of their contract with her.

As a result of the ruling, Green is now entitled to the full $1 million fee that she was originally contracted for.

In a statement issued after the ruling, Green said: “I have won my claim against the financiers of the proposed film — and all the allegations which they made against me have been wholly rejected by the judge.

“My professional reputation has been upheld. The judge has found that I was never in breach of my contractual obligations. The judgment is clear. I am grateful to the court, to the judge, to my legal team and to my valiant agent, who is my strength and my shield.”

She added: “I am an actor and I am passionate about my work. I want to make films that are of the highest quality and that I can be proud of. I am grateful to the court for upholding my right to do that.”

The case has drawn attention to the issue of gender inequality in the film industry, with Green's supporters arguing that she was unfairly targeted by the producers because she is a woman.

Green has said she faced sexism throughout her career.

“I have been told that I am too old, too fat, too thin, too pretty, too ugly,” she said in an interview. “I have been told that I am not good enough, that I will never make it. But I have never given up. I have always fought for what I believe in and I will continue to do so.”