Why were Afghanistan so poor in against India in their first Test outing?
A month earlier, Ireland had fared so much better against Pakistan when they started in the format.
Ireland are the side Afghanistan have measured themselves against for much of the past decade.
Having seen them push Pakistan so far on their Test debut in Malahide, the Afghans must have thought they had it in them to do similar when they got their chance.
And yet, when it came to it, they were miles off, embarrassed within two days. It was the first time a Test had finished so quickly on the subcontinent.
This feels a bit like when India thrashed UAE in the World Cup in Perth and spent the rest of the afternoon playing footy. Gonna be able to play headers and volleys for three days here #INDvAFG
— Paul Radley (@PaulRadley) June 15, 2018
It is worth pointing out that they were up against the world’s No 1 side, on their own territory. There is a reason the best of the rest in Test cricket regard India as a major frontier to conquer.
Set against the Ireland-Pakistan example, there was a far more substantial gulf in experience.
Of course, Pakistan have years of pedigree as a Test nation. But their XI for the Malahide Test had actually played less first-class matches than the Irish team.
By contrast, three Indian players – Ishant Sharma (82), Cheteshwar Pujara (58), Ravi Ashwin (58) – have played more Test matches (198) between them than the entire Afghan XI have played first-class games (168). Mujeeb Ur Rahman, the much-hyped teenage spinner, was making his first-class debut in a Test.
So it stands to reason the Indians were going to be cannier than the newcomers.
______________
Read more
India-Afghanistan takeaways: Dhawan and Vijay cement opening slots for England tour
A day of two halves for Afghanistan's cricketers in debut Test against India
Long read: From Afghanistan to Dubai via Scotland - cricket at centre of Ghazi's journey
Mike Gatting recalls trip to India when his MCC-led side were hammered by Afghanistan
Germany experiences huge spike in cricket's popularity since European migrant crisis
______________
What can they do to improve? Temper the machismo for starters.
Afghanistan are already a long way removed from their early days, when attempting to hit every ball as far as possible was a necessity to prove their manliness.
Back then, they only made it through 50 overs with luck. In their first Test, they lost all 20 wickets in under 67 overs.
The implosion was down to the rashness of their strokeplay. It was typified when, after a promising second-innings stand with Hashmatullah Shahidi, captain Asghar Stanikzai surrendered his wicket with a street-cricket slog. Their demise came about almost immediately.
“It was just the beginning for them,” opposing captain Ajinkya Rahane said. “You cannot blame them. They tried their best.
“It is just about playing the matches. Five-day, Test-match cricket is all about attitude and patience.”
When Afghanistan started playing international cricket they were rather inconsistent, unable to adapt when things weren't going to plan. They figured things out quicker than most people expected. I suspect they'll get Test cricket figured out quicker than today suggests too.
— Andrew Nixon (@andrewnixon79) June 15, 2018
Afghanistan's @Coachsim13 made a similar point. Said he was happy this debut was against the best side in the world. Showed up their weaknesses more harshly than perhaps a lower ranked side would. So they can learn quicker https://t.co/LaB6i1MMIV
— Paul Radley (@PaulRadley) June 15, 2018
Afghanistan coach Phil Simmons was glad of the chance to face the very best at the first opportunity.
“When you play against the best, you know how much work you have to do to get where they are,” Simmons said.
“That is what I would take out of this game, that the players now see – it is not just me telling them – how tough Test cricket is.
“I think that is what we have to take from this. We might have been more competitive against No 8 or 9, but for what we have learnt, I will take that.”
