About 30 years ago, shortly after I joined London's The Sunday Times as deputy editor, I had the idea of publishing a list of Britain's richest men (they were almost all men in those days). It wasn't an original idea – I had just been to the United States, where the latest Forbes rich list had been recently published, and everywhere I went people were talking about it. There was keen competition to be in it, and great jealousy if someone was above you.
I had actually tried it before, when I was the City editor of the Sunday Telegraph, and I allotted a young researcher, Philip Beresford, to work on it, aiming to limit it (as Fortune did in its early days) to 100 names. Within days I was receiving angry phone calls and lawyers' letters from people who were determined they were not going to be on the list under any circumstances – and if their names did appear they would remove their advertising, boycott the paper and pursue us through the courts. A friend, who would have ranked somewhere around the middle, called to say he would never speak to me again if he was mentioned.
I remember one particular call from a former Scotland Yard detective who told me he was the security adviser for the Sainsbury family, who we had tentatively put near the top (today they are not even in the top 100). “What you are proposing to publish, Mr Fallon, amounts to a kidnappers’ charter. The sons and daughters of everyone on that list will be in danger.” He indicated he was already well down the road to providing armoured vehicles and permanent bodyguards for the younger generation.
When the proprietor, Lord Hartwell, called to say he was being lobbied ferociously by the rich and famous and was I sure the exercise was worthwhile, I gave up. He was quite prepared to withstand any pressure, but we were not doing terribly well in our list-making: information was sparse in those days, and basically all we had was the published shareholdings of directors in public companies and unpublished accounts for private companies filed in the dusty depths of Companies House, which required weeks and months of trawling.
At The Sunday Times I had more resources, and backed by the editor Andrew Neil (and by my new proprietor, Rupert Murdoch, who was a great enthusiast), I brought Mr Beresford across to work on a more detailed list, the first of which we published in 1989. Those early lists, imperfect though they were (and still are), provide a wonderful snapshot of Britain towards the end of the Thatcher era: the 1991 top 400 featured one sovereign (the queen), 13 dukes (out of 24), eight marquesses, 21 earls and two countesses (out of 156), 12 viscounts (out of 27), 26 lords and one baroness. There were 104 aristocrats in all, mostly with inherited wealth, more than a fifth of the total. There were 79 Old Etonians, 12 Harrovians and three Wykehamists, and to round out this picture of the British establishment, there were 42 members of White's, London's most exclusive gentleman's club, and 29 members of the Turf Club. We calculated that between them, the people on our list owned 4.4 million acres of land, nearly 10 per cent of the total land area of the United Kingdom.
This week The Sunday Times published its latest list, still compiled by Mr Beresford, which shows a vastly changed landscape. For a start only one of the top 10, the Duke of Westminster (No 6), is a through-and-through Brit. Of the others, the Reuben brothers, who rank No 1 with a wealth of £13.1bn (Dh69.4bn), were born in Mumbai, as were the Hinduja brothers at No 2. Len Blavatnik is an American-born Russian who lives in London, as is Alisher Usmanov. The Rausing family (which owns Tetra Pak) are basically Swedish, and Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken owes her £9.1bn fortune to her inheritance of the Dutch brewery business.
Kirsty Bertarelli, who ranks fifth with nearly £10bn, was actually a Miss UK but she entered the list only by marrying the pharmaceutical billionaire Ernesto, who is an Italian.
Further down there are three South Africans, including a fascinating newcomer called Christo Wiese, in for the first time at £4bn, and Nicky Oppenheimer, who managed to extract the family fortune from De Beers and Anglo American before the crash.
Just about the only UK-born Britons who have created their own businesses are the technological genius James Dyson (17) and the Virgin Group’s Richard Branson at 19.
In an era when wealth and income disparity have become the biggest social topic of the day, as evidenced by the extraordinary success of Thomas Piketty's unreadable best-seller Capital in the Twenty-First Century, there is something very healthy about the constantly changing kaleidoscope and dynamism of Britain's wealthy. It was not what we expected when we started out all those years ago.
Ivan Fallon is a former business editor of The Sunday Times.
business@thenational.ae
Follow The National's Business section on Twitter
COMPANY%20PROFILE
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ECompany%20name%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3A%20ASI%20(formerly%20DigestAI)%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStarted%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%202017%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFounders%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Quddus%20Pativada%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EBased%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Dubai%2C%20UAE%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EIndustry%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Artificial%20intelligence%2C%20education%20technology%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFunding%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20%243%20million-plus%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EInvestors%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20GSV%20Ventures%2C%20Character%2C%20Mark%20Cuban%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
KILLING OF QASSEM SULEIMANI
Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026
1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years
If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.
2. E-invoicing in the UAE
Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption.
3. More tax audits
Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks.
4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime
Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.
5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit
There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.
6. Further transfer pricing enforcement
Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes.
7. Limited time periods for audits
Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion.
8. Pillar 2 implementation
Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.
9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services
Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations.
10. Substance and CbC reporting focus
Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity.
Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer
ULTRA PROCESSED FOODS
- Carbonated drinks, sweet or savoury packaged snacks, confectionery, mass-produced packaged breads and buns
- Margarines and spreads; cookies, biscuits, pastries, cakes, and cake mixes, breakfast cereals, cereal and energy bars
- Energy drinks, milk drinks, fruit yoghurts and fruit drinks, cocoa drinks, meat and chicken extracts and instant sauces
- Infant formulas and follow-on milks, health and slimming products such as powdered or fortified meal and dish substitutes
- Many ready-to-heat products including pre-prepared pies and pasta and pizza dishes, poultry and fish nuggets and sticks, sausages, burgers, hot dogs, and other reconstituted meat products, powdered and packaged instant soups, noodles and desserts
The biog
Favourite films: Casablanca and Lawrence of Arabia
Favourite books: Start with Why by Simon Sinek and Good to be Great by Jim Collins
Favourite dish: Grilled fish
Inspiration: Sheikh Zayed's visionary leadership taught me to embrace new challenges.
Tank warfare
Lt Gen Erik Petersen, deputy chief of programs, US Army, has argued it took a “three decade holiday” on modernising tanks.
“There clearly remains a significant armoured heavy ground manoeuvre threat in this world and maintaining a world class armoured force is absolutely vital,” the general said in London last week.
“We are developing next generation capabilities to compete with and deter adversaries to prevent opportunism or miscalculation, and, if necessary, defeat any foe decisively.”