US President Donald Trump's initial travel ban issued in January 2017 sparked protests and legal challenges. AP
US President Donald Trump's initial travel ban issued in January 2017 sparked protests and legal challenges. AP

Second US federal judge blocks latest Trump travel ban



A second US federal judge on Wednesday blocked the latest version of president Donald Trump’s travel ban, citing the Mr Trump's own tweets as evidence that it remained an unconstitutional policy designed to discriminate against Muslims.

The decision follows a similar ruling in Hawaii, which imposed a nationwide restraining order on the new restrictions just hours before they were due to come into effect on Wednesday.

US district judge Theodore Chuang, sitting in Maryland, said Mr Trump’s public comments undermined the administration’s claims that the third travel ban — set out in a presidential proclamation — was based on national security considerations, such as the country’s ability to screen travellers and to share information with the US.

“Rather, they cast the proclamation as the inextricable re-animation of the twice-enjoined Muslim ban,” he wrote in a 91-page opinion accompanying his order.

It marks the third time the administration has had its travel restrictions overturned by the courts. Opponents argued that each revision has been nothing but window dressing designed to mask the fact that the provisions are motivated by a desire to discriminate against Muslims.

________________

Read more:

________________

Mr Chuang agreed.

He pointed out that the government’s own evidence showed that no one from the designated countries — Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Iran and Libya, as well as Chad, North Korea and Venezuela — had carried out a terrorist attack on US soil in 40 years.

And Mr Chuang said the administration had not explained why Somalia had been included when officials admitted it was properly sharing information.

In particular, he said his decision was based on Mr Trump’s own stance. He included in his argument one of the president’s favourite, apocryphal anecdotes about Gen John Pershing in the Philippines in the first half of the 20th century. He is reputed to have used an unusual method to put down an uprising.

“Particularly where, in August 2017, president Trump tweeted a statement that a method hostile to Islam — shooting Muslims with bullets dipped in pig’s blood — should be used to deter future terrorism, there is no record of public statements showing any change in the president’s intentions relating to a Muslim ban,” he wrote.

Ultimately, he concluded, the third iteration remained too close to the first two orders which had already been blocked.

The decisions in Hawaii and Maryland represent temporary restraining orders, essentially allowing time for higher courts to consider the constitutional implications of the policy.

Each is slightly different in its sweep — the Hawaii decision allows the government to impose its restrictions on North Korea and Venezuela, for example. But taken together, they indicate that the two judges believe the campaigners have a stronger case than the Trump administration.

A spokesman for the department of justice has already said it will appeal.

“Today's ruling is incorrect, fails to properly respect the separation of powers, and has the potential to cause serious negative consequences for our national security,” he said.

Campaigners said they were already preparing for the next round of the legal battle.

Hakim Ouansafi, chairman of the Muslim Association of Hawaii, which brought one of the successful cases, said the win was bittersweet.

“We are very pleased that this thing has been blocked. It affects 150 million people,” he said. “It is a victory for everyone who believes in freedom of religion and who is against discrimination."

But, he added: "At the same time we are prepared for this president to come up with version four.”

Becca Heller, director of the International Refugee Assistance Programme, one of the plaintiffs in the Maryland case, said: “No matter how many times the administration tries to dress it up in a different outfit, it’s still a Muslim ban.

“We will continue challenging it until this cruel and senseless policy is indefinitely blocked. We’ve cleared our schedules.”

RESULT

Arsenal 1 Chelsea 2
Arsenal:
Aubameyang (13')
Chelsea: Jorginho (83'), Abraham (87') 

 

Rock in a Hard Place: Music and Mayhem in the Middle East
Orlando Crowcroft
Zed Books

Gender equality in the workplace still 200 years away

It will take centuries to achieve gender parity in workplaces around the globe, according to a December report from the World Economic Forum.

The WEF study said there had been some improvements in wage equality in 2018 compared to 2017, when the global gender gap widened for the first time in a decade.

But it warned that these were offset by declining representation of women in politics, coupled with greater inequality in their access to health and education.

At current rates, the global gender gap across a range of areas will not close for another 108 years, while it is expected to take 202 years to close the workplace gap, WEF found.

The Geneva-based organisation's annual report tracked disparities between the sexes in 149 countries across four areas: education, health, economic opportunity and political empowerment.

After years of advances in education, health and political representation, women registered setbacks in all three areas this year, WEF said.

Only in the area of economic opportunity did the gender gap narrow somewhat, although there is not much to celebrate, with the global wage gap narrowing to nearly 51 per cent.

And the number of women in leadership roles has risen to 34 per cent globally, WEF said.

At the same time, the report showed there are now proportionately fewer women than men participating in the workforce, suggesting that automation is having a disproportionate impact on jobs traditionally performed by women.

And women are significantly under-represented in growing areas of employment that require science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills, WEF said.

* Agence France Presse

Gulf Under 19s final

Dubai College A 50-12 Dubai College B

MATCH INFO

Asian Champions League, last 16, first leg:

Al Jazira 3 Persepolis 2

Second leg:

Monday, Azizi Stadium, Tehran. Kick off 7pm

ABU DHABI CARD

5pm: UAE Martyrs Cup (TB) Conditions; Dh90,000; 2,200m
5.30pm: Wathba Stallions Cup (PA) Handicap; Dh70,000; 1,400m​​​​​​​
6pm: UAE Matyrs Trophy (PA) Maiden; Dh80,000; 1,600m​​​​​​​
6.30pm: Sheikha Fatima bint Mubarak (IFAHR) Apprentice Championship (PA) Prestige; Dh100,000; 1,600m​​​​​​​
7pm: Sheikha Fatima bint Mubarak (IFAHR) Ladies World Championship (PA) Prestige; Dh125,000; 1,600m​​​​​​​
8pm: Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan Jewel Crown (PA) Group 1; Dh5,000,000; 1,600m

Visa changes give families fresh hope

Foreign workers can sponsor family members based solely on their income

Male residents employed in the UAE can sponsor immediate family members, such as wife and children, subject to conditions that include a minimum salary of Dh 4,000 or Dh 3,000 plus accommodation.

Attested original marriage certificate, birth certificate of the child, ejari or rental contract, labour contract, salary certificate must be submitted to the government authorised typing centre to complete the sponsorship process

In Abu Dhabi, a woman can sponsor her husband and children if she holds a residence permit stating she is an engineer, teacher, doctor, nurse or any profession related to the medical sector and her monthly salary is at least Dh 10,000 or Dh 8,000 plus accommodation.

In Dubai, if a woman is not employed in the above categories she can get approval to sponsor her family if her monthly salary is more than Dh 10,000 and with a special permission from the Department of Naturalization and Residency Dubai.

To sponsor parents, a worker should earn Dh20,000 or Dh19,000 a month, plus a two-bedroom accommodation