Cricket World Cup: Data analysis continues to make inroads but still a 'long way' to go

Based on Match Impact data, Virat Kohli is a +17 batsman, meaning since the 2015 World Cup he has contributed 17 more runs than the average batsman would in the same situation. AFP

For many supporters in the region, the most important number they will be worried about ahead of the Cricket World Cup is probably 199. The amount, in dirhams, it costs to subscribe to OSN’s TV package for the tournament.

Once that figure has been successfully debited and the action starts, viewers will find themselves assailed by a torrent of numbers of a different kind.

Cricket has always been a numbers game, but the depth and sophistication of the data used to illustrate the game has gathered pace markedly in recent years. More than ever before, the sport is in thrall to statistics, and not just limited to the old measure of batting and bowling averages.

How many slower balls does Jasprit Bumrah bowl during the slog overs of a one-day international? Are all Sri Lankan batsmen iffy against short-pitched bowling?

What is the best place to bowl if Jos Buttler is intent on scooping the ball over the wicketkeeper’s head for six? Data can be readily mined to provide informed answers to most questions like this.

And yet many of those who crunch cricket’s numbers for a living insist the sport still has a long way to go.

“The sport is only really starting to get its head round how to use data, and how to use different metrics for specific formats,” said Dan Weston, a UK-based data analyst for Sports Analytics Advantage.

“Of course, some teams are more advanced than others, and some coaches are more innovative than others. However, as a sport on the whole, it’s a long way behind American sports, which are much closer with regards to being ‘solved’.

“I do think cricket will get there eventually, but I anticipate it will be a very gradual process. There are simply too many hurdles for the sport to overcome for there to be rapid progress.”

The World Cup broadcast itself will be informed by statistics from CricViz. The tournament’s “official analytics provider” also works with Sky in the UK, Fox in Australia, the Pakistan Super League, as well as two international teams, and sides in the Indian Premier League and Big Bash League, as well as elsewhere.

Freddie Wilde, a CricViz data analyst who was the first editorial recruit when the company was founded in 2015, agrees that the use of data analysis is still in its infancy in cricket.

At present, it largely informs the decisions and gameplans sides make ahead of matches. Wilde foresees a time when a side’s analysts have more scope to assist how a side reacts once the first ball is bowled.

The pitch conditions, for example, provide a significant variable. While teams can – and do – use recent history of scores at the grounds they are playing it as a guide for what par might be, pitch conditions are not always exactly similar from one game to the next, even at the same venue.

It is one variable that baseball – the sport with probably the biggest influence on data analysis in cricket – does not have to worry about.

“I think in-game is probably the most untapped area of analytics,” Wilde said.

“We can pick up things during a match that could be of immense value to teams. It might be that pace off balls are working a lot better than normal, or perhaps we could identify using ball tracking that this is an unusual pitch for the venue and we might need to reassess our expectation of a par score.”

___________________________________

The National's greatest Cricket World Cup XI

1. Adam Gilchrist (Australia 1999, 2003, 2007): Before the ODI game went supersonic because of the influence of Twenty20, scoring 149 in 104 balls seemed remarkable. Doing it to win a World Cup final, with a torn squash ball inside his batting glove, as he did in 2007 was all the more so. AFP

2. Sachin Tendulkar (India 1992, 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011): Most runs overall (2,278). Most runs in a single tournament (673 in 2003). More scores in excess of 50 than anyone else. All he missed out on was scoring his 100th international hundred in the 2011 final. Still, at least he ended that with a win. Getty Images

3. Ricky Ponting (Australia 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011): Second only to Tendulkar in the run-chart, he was a central cog in Australia winning a hat-trick of titles from 1999 onwards. His 140 not out settled the final against India in South Africa in 2003, and he lifted the trophy again four years later. Getty Images

4. Aravinda de Silva (Sri Lanka 1987, 1992, 1996, 1999, 2003): Sri Lanka played their first World Cup as a full member of the ICC in 1983. Within 13 years, they were world champions. Few did more to bring the 1996 glory about than De Silva, whose 104 not out guided them past Australia in the final. Getty Images

5. Viv Richards (West Indies 1975, 1979, 1983, 1987): The Antiguan great played his first ODIs at the first World Cup in 1975. He took home a winner’s medal from that tournament, then four years later he scored 138 not out in the final. In 1983, he was the second highest runscorer. Getty Images

6. 6 Kapil Dev (India 1979, 1983, 1987, 1992): He remains the youngest player ever to captain a World Cup-winning side, aged 24 in 1983. That win against West Indies might be the most important result in cricket’s recent history, given how power and influence has headed towards India ever since. Getty Images

7. Wasim Akram (Pakistan 1987, 1992, 1996, 1999, 2003): The third most prolific wicket-taker in World Cups, after Glenn McGrath and Muttiah Muralitharan, with 55. Surely the two most memorable are those of Allan Lamb and Chris Lewis in successive balls that tilted the 1992 final in Pakistan’s favour. Getty Images

8. Shane Warne (Australia 1996, 1999): Warne played in just two World Cups, yet still managed to leave an indelible mark on three. He took 12 wickets as Australia reached the 1996 final in Lahore. He was man of the match in the 1999 final. Then he was chucked out on the eve of the 2003 tournament for a failed dope test. Getty Images

9. Muttiah Muralitharan (Sri Lanka 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011): His haul of 68 wickets is the second most in World Cup history. He took 1- 31 in the final as Sri Lanka enjoyed their greatest moment in the sport by winning in 1996. And he played in finals in 2007 and 2011, too. Getty Images

10. Glenn McGrath (Australia 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007): McGrath played the last of his 250 ODIs in the final against Sri Lanka in 2007. By that point, he had three World Cup wins in a row, and more wickets (71), at a better average (18.19), than anyone else in the history of the competition. Getty Images

11. Joel Garner (West Indies 1979, 1983): The towering Barbadian was playing just his sixth ODI when West Indies met England in the 1979 final. He took 5-38 – four of which were bowled – as the host nation were blown away by 96 runs at Lord’s. Getty Images

___________________________________

Weston’s work has involved creating a bespoke player database for an IPL franchise in advance of auction in the past.

He says the use of analytics should be a prerequisite when a side goes shopping on the open market in franchise cricket – but he also thinks it can be vital in selecting international teams.

“Using quality data analysis would be able to give a huge competitive advantage when assembling a T20 franchise,” Weston said.

“To someone who works with player recruitment data, it is obvious that many teams don’t use analytics well, or at all, when recruiting players.

“A lot of it is still emotional or relationship driven. For example, the owner wants a marquee player who might boost their ego, or who can assist with marketing purposes.

“Or a coach might want players that he knows well, as opposed to going the extra mile in finding an undervalued player who might actually be much better.

“With regards to an international team selection, it would also be extremely useful. Understanding how to translate historical domestic performances to expectation on the international stages, including age-curve analysis, for example, would be something that most teams would benefit from.”

CricViz have a metric which works for ODI and T20 cricket which essentially puts a single value on every player and it considers batting, bowling and fielding.

“Match Impact is based on models of List A and T20 cricket that forecast an expected total after every ball, taking into account the current score and the venue being played at,” Wilde said.

“The model prescribes a positive or negative value after every ball - measured in runs - to the batsman, the bowler and when relevant, the fielder, according to whether their actions have increased or decreased the expected total.

“For example, a six hit off the first ball of the third over with the score 20 for two might increase the expected total by five runs, in this case the batsman will have scored +5 for that ball and the bowler -5. Ball-by-ball scores are aggregated to give an overall score.

“Since the 2015 World Cup Virat Kohli is a +17 batsman which means he contributes 17 runs more than the average batsman had he batted in the same situations as Kohli.”