How 9/11 drove American democracy to the brink

Eventual backlash to many US decisions after September 11 helped contribute to polarisation, culture wars and the January 6 attempted insurrection

FILE - In this Jan. 6, 2021 file photo, supporters of President Donald Trump, including Jacob Chansley, right with fur hat, are confronted by U.S. Capitol Police officers outside the Senate Chamber inside the Capitol in Washington. Many of those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 cited falsehoods about the election, and now some of them are hoping their gullibility helps them in court. Albert Watkins, the St. Louis attorney representing Chansley, the so-called QAnon shaman, likened the process to brainwashing, or falling into the clutches of a cult. Repeated exposure to falsehood and incendiary rhetoric, Watkins said, ultimately overwhelmed his client's ability to discern reality. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)
Beta V.1.0 - Powered by automated translation
An embedded image that relates to this article

On September 11, 2001, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed into a Pennsylvania field after passengers prevented the Al Qaeda hijackers from reaching their intended target: the US Capitol.

Two decades later, a mob of Americans successfully attacked the very same building as part of an attempted insurrection.

The failed overthrow of a presidential election on January 6 highlights the perilous low that US democracy has fallen to since 9/11. Even today, most Republican voters still don't believe Donald Trump lost, and the country's hyper-partisan divide has only deepened since Joe Biden took office.

While the cleaving of modern America pre-dates 9/11 and worsened in 2000 when the US Supreme Court cleared the way for George W. Bush to win that year's contested presidential election, the September 11 fallout has sickened the fabric of US society in ways that perhaps even Osama bin Laden could barely have imagined.

“September 11 really came at the worst time because it was right after the contested election of 2000,” Nickie Michaud-Wild, a sociologist at Upper Iowa University who specialises in American reactions to 9/11, told The National.

“That’s something that we could have turned a corner on if it were not for 9/11. I think it was a perfect set-up for that divide to become exacerbated greatly.”

Over the course of four administrations, seemingly unending and unwinnable foreign wars and the rapid expansion and centralisation of vast government surveillance powers have eroded public trust in the federal government, American politicians and the mainstream media.

Although the Iraq invasion briefly fuelled anti-war protests, a Gallup poll from 2003 found that 72 per cent of Americans supported the US occupation — buoyed by the Bush administration’s efforts to give Baghdad a role to play in the new war on terror.

In justifying the war, the Bush administration falsely asserted that Saddam Hussein had ties to Al Qaeda. Most US media outlets marched in lockstep to Mr Bush's rush to war and prestigious publications such as The New York Times uncritically parroted his administration’s inaccurate claims that Iraq was actively developing weapons of mass destruction.

A Pew Research Centre poll in 2007 found that the American public’s trust in both the military and the press to provide accurate information about Iraq severely eroded in the first four years of the war.

By that year, only 46 per cent of Americans trusted the military and 38 per cent trusted the press to provide accurate information on Iraq -- a drop from 80 percent for both institutions in 2003.

“The anti-war view was not being represented very well in the mainstream media, so even people who were progressives felt that hugely damaged their trust in the culture, institutions, everything else,” Ms Michaud-Wild said.

Although Mr Bush at first enjoyed broad Republican support for the Iraq war, former president Donald Trump would eventually appeal to those same voters in 2016, criticising his opponents from both parties who supported the conflict and repeatedly referencing the US media’s failure to critically report on it.

After Mr Trump and former president Barack Obama, Joe Biden became the third president to try to capitalise on the American public’s fatigue after two decades of war, officially withdrawing from Afghanistan at the end of August.

But despite the withdrawal from Afghanistan, American troops remain stationed in Iraq and Syria and the US military continues to launch drone strikes across the globe.

Data compiled by the Costs of War project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs indicate the US has launched military operations in 85 countries throughout the Middle East, Africa and Asia since September 11.

The data also show that the post-September 11 wars have killed more than 800,000 people in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen while costing US taxpayers $6.4 trillion through 2020.

“The idea that the wars are ending when we take some last number of troops out of Afghanistan is wrong,” Catherine Lutz, co-director of the Costs of War project, told The National. “It’s a global war.

“There are companies that get contracts to do this. There are generals or officers who will make their careers on continuing to be the guy who trains forces in Africa. Unless the public — or Congress, more importantly — puts the brakes on some of this, we’re going to see that for decades.”

Post-September 11 institutions have also become flash points in America's ever-worsening culture wars, such as the debate over whether to close the notorious Guantanamo Bay detention facility — a proposition that is now favoured by most Democrats and opposed by most Republicans.

The battle between conservatives and liberals over social values was a primary fault-line in American politics prior to 9/11, but the attacks intensified the debate over a significant facet of that culture war: immigration.

The series of wars that followed 9/11 contributed to the greatest global refugee crisis since the World War II, helping fuel the rise of nativist politics within the Republican Party.

The refugee crisis came at a time when violence against Muslims had skyrocketed after September 11. FBI data indicate that the rate of anti-Muslim hate crimes has remained consistently higher than it was before the attack.

The Bush administration promptly established the Department of Homeland Security and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency in response to September 11.

And the culture wars over immigration have propelled backlash among the Democratic base in recent years over ICE’s harsh detainment of migrants, fuelling a movement to abolish ICE among the left.

The conservative blowback against refugees from the Middle East and Central Asia as well as Latin American migrants attempting to cross the southern border helped propel Mr Trump to the White House.

“All these things that were coming on to the scene — the white supremacist website Storm Front was one of the first websites,” said Ms Michaud-Wild.

“Historical circumstances can prime not only the divisions over immigration and loss of trust, but also the incredible proliferation of conspiracy theories and white supremacists — it’s all tied together.”

One of the earliest internet conspiracies to proliferate within the US was the September 11 “truther” movement, which falsely asserted that the attacks were an inside job carried out by the Bush administration to justify its multiple wars.

FILE PHOTO: Proud Boys member Joe Biggs (front row second from left in grey plaid shirt) poses with other members before he was later arrested for involvement in the storming of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington. D.C., U.S. Picture taken January 6, 2021. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/File Photo

Since then, the digital age has given birth to countless conspiracy theories unrelated to September 11, including QAnon.

Mr Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6 over lies — repeated frequently by the former president — claiming mass voter fraud in the 2020 election.

September 11 was no doubt far from the minds of the insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol.

But their actions were the product of a political and social atmosphere powered by the loss of trust in public institutions and the increasingly acrimonious culture wars that the American response to September 11 has amplified.

Updated: September 09, 2021, 6:17 PM