Michael Spavor is one of two Canadians who have been held for more than two years in apparent retaliation for Canada's arrest of a senior Chinese telecom executive. AP Photo
Michael Spavor is one of two Canadians who have been held for more than two years in apparent retaliation for Canada's arrest of a senior Chinese telecom executive. AP Photo
Michael Spavor is one of two Canadians who have been held for more than two years in apparent retaliation for Canada's arrest of a senior Chinese telecom executive. AP Photo
Michael Spavor is one of two Canadians who have been held for more than two years in apparent retaliation for Canada's arrest of a senior Chinese telecom executive. AP Photo

Ottawa and Beijing exchange words after Canadian Michael Spavor stands trial in China


  • English
  • Arabic

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau expressed concern about the trial of a Canadian citizen in China on Friday.

Michael Spavor, who has been detained in China since December 2018, stood trial in the northern city of Dandong on charges of illegally spying on national secrets and illegally providing state secrets to entities outside of China.

The trial lasted only a few hours and ended without a verdict or sentencing. Canadian consular officials were denied entry to the courtroom, prompting Mr Trudeau to speak out.

“It is disappointing that the trial that Michael Spavor went through and possibly the trial that Michael Kovrig will go through on Monday is happening in secret without transparency, without access by Canadian consular officials,” Mr Trudeau said, referring to another Canadian who is facing similar charges of espionage.

Ottawa says the “two Michaels”, as they are referred to in Canadian media, are victims of arbitrary detention and are being tried in retaliation for Canada’s arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou in December 2018.

Beijing denies this. A representative for the Chinese Embassy in Ottawa called the accusations “fact distorting”.

In a statement released on the embassy’s website, the representative said, “Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor were arrested and prosecuted in accordance with the law for suspected crimes undermining China's national security. China's judicial authorities have been dealing with the cases independently and ensuring their lawful rights, including consular visits to them.”

Tension between the two countries has been high since the arrests in 2018, and the trial of Mr Spavor and the coming one of Mr Kovrig are likely to further complicate bilateral relations.

“It’s an indication of a change of season, that we’re going into a winter in bilateral relations,” said Paul Evans, a professor in the school of public policy and global affairs at the University of British Columbia.

Mr Trudeau has looked to Washington for help in securing the release of Mr Spavor and Mr Kovrig. “We will continue to work very closely with all our allies, including the United States, on trying to resolve the situation,” he said.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken held face-to-face meetings with his Chinese counterpart in Anchorage, Alaska, on Thursday and Friday. A deputy representative for the US State Department reiterated calls for China to release Mr Spavor and Mr Kovrig, calling their detention "arbitrary and baseless".

Match info:

Portugal 1
Ronaldo (4')

Morocco 0

Chatham House Rule

A mark of Chatham House’s influence 100 years on since its founding,  was Moscow’s formal declaration last month that it was an “undesirable
organisation”. 

 

The depth of knowledge and academics that it drew on
following the Ukraine invasion had broadcast Mr Putin’s chicanery.  

 

The institute is more used to accommodating world leaders,
with Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher among those helping it provide
authoritative commentary on world events. 

 

Chatham House was formally founded as the Royal Institute of
International Affairs following the peace conferences of World War One. Its
founder, Lionel Curtis, wanted a more scientific examination of international affairs
with a transparent exchange of information and ideas.  

 

That arena of debate and analysis was enhanced by the “Chatham
House Rule” states that the contents of any meeting can be discussed outside Chatham
House but no mention can be made identifying individuals who commented.  

 

This has enabled some candid exchanges on difficult subjects
allowing a greater degree of free speech from high-ranking figures.  

 

These meetings are highly valued, so much so that
ambassadors reported them in secret diplomatic cables that – when they were
revealed in the Wikileaks reporting – were thus found to have broken the rule. However,
most speeches are held on the record.  

 

Its research and debate has offered fresh ideas to
policymakers enabling them to more coherently address troubling issues from climate
change to health and food security.   

 
TOP%2010%20MOST%20POLLUTED%20CITIES
%3Cp%3E1.%20Bhiwadi%2C%20India%0D%3Cbr%3E2.%20Ghaziabad%2C%20India%0D%3Cbr%3E3.%20Hotan%2C%20China%0D%3Cbr%3E4.%20Delhi%2C%20India%0D%3Cbr%3E5.%20Jaunpur%2C%20India%0D%3Cbr%3E6.%20Faisalabad%2C%20Pakistan%0D%3Cbr%3E7.%20Noida%2C%20India%0D%3Cbr%3E8.%20Bahawalpur%2C%20Pakistan%0D%3Cbr%3E9.%20Peshawar%2C%20Pakistan%0D%3Cbr%3E10.%20Bagpat%2C%20India%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cem%3ESource%3A%20IQAir%3C%2Fem%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%0A