Members of Hizbollah hold their flags in the southern Lebanese town of Kfour. Mahmoud Zayyat / AFP
Members of Hizbollah hold their flags in the southern Lebanese town of Kfour. Mahmoud Zayyat / AFP

Israel's simplistic Hizbollah-Lebanese army narrative serves only to set a collision course

Last week, Israel’s defence minister, Avigdor Lieberman, told his soldiers that the Lebanese army was an integral part of Hizbollah, and that in any future war Israel would probably have to fight both. Mr Lieberman’s remarks were overly simplistic, but if Israel adopts such an attitude, its behaviour will lead to the very outcome the minister was warning against.

It's undeniable that the Lebanese army and Hizbollah frequently coordinate their actions, if only because of the political influence enjoyed by the party in Lebanon and the fact that the army has no option of confronting the party militarily without risking a civil war. This situation is not normal, certainly, but nor does it mean the army is Hizbollah's tool. Both are immovable objects in Lebanese society. And if Israel and Lebanon are at war, yes the army would fight back. That's what armies do.

There is the growing tendency among some groups in Israel and the United States to conflate the army and Hizbollah, in such a way as to assume that they are indistinguishable. This not only is devoid of nuance, it helps justify a particular Israeli reaction in a possible war. It will also undermine and neutralise any opposition to Hizbollah in Lebanon.

Assuming that the army is "a part of Hizbollah" is simply inaccurate. Such a view fails to take into consideration that the military is a complex institution, made up many sects and interest groups, some with Hizbollah, some against, and some that mainly benefit from the status quo. Like Lebanon itself, the army is a "house of many mansions" that cannot be shoehorned into simpleminded interpretative catchphrases.


Read more from Michael Young


For example, a significant portion of the military’s rank and file is Sunni. While the tendency is to focus on the officer corps, any command decision taken at the top must factor in whether soldiers at the lower levels will willingly implement them. Given widespread Sunni hostility to Hizbollah, to try to tie the army tightly to the party’s choices is not something pro-Hizbollah officers can do without carefully measuring the risks.

The effort to conflate the army and Hizbollah is also worrisome because it, essentially, aims to justify massive retaliation against Lebanon in the event of a forthcoming war. This is the so-called "Dahieh Doctrine" that Israel developed after the 2006 war in Lebanon. It holds that any future conflict would lead to massive Israeli destruction of Lebanon's infrastructure, much as it did to the southern suburbs of Beirut in 2006.

By insisting the Lebanese army and Hizbollah are one, Israel is effectively saying that the Lebanese state and Hizbollah are one. This implies that Israel’s destruction of Lebanon would be regarded as legitimate. Mr Lieberman’s statement was in part designed to deter Hizbollah, by warning the party that it would have to take responsibility for any new war. But it was also a rationale for possibly killing thousands of innocent civilians and engaging in destruction exacerbating national misery.

Perhaps the greatest problem in the assumption that the Lebanese army and state are as one with Hizbollah is that it ignores all those Lebanese who actually oppose the party. It is fair to say that they constitute a majority in the country, albeit a helpless one, as they have no guns. However, by peddling a simplistic narrative suggesting that the Lebanese state is a branch of Hizbollah, those who hold such a view only discredit the state, strengthening Hizbollah in relative terms, while undermining any backlash against the party following a possible war.


Read more from Opinion


Why is that? Because such an accusation creates an “either-or” scenario leaving no third way. Since the Lebanese and their state cannot be on Israel’s side, they must necessarily be Hizbollah’s accomplices, meriting whatever punishment they receive. The vast majority of Lebanese who want no war, but also have no real ability to prevent it, are dismissed in this version. It is astonishing that those holding such a view cannot see that this only plays into Hizbollah’s hands.

Moreover, Israel’s widespread destruction of Lebanon would leave no room for dissent. Hizbollah will insist that unity and solidarity are the only acceptable responses to such vengefulness. Few Lebanese will be able to disagree, particularly if the Israelis target the army, which enjoys much support in the country, as well as civilian infrastructure. All this would only help impose Hizbollah's version of events.

Gaza provides a good example. In 2014 Israel also engaged in massive retaliation against the territory to end Hamas's rocket fire, destroying or damaging not far from 100,000 homes, according to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. Yet this hardly dented Hamas's control. Nor is such behaviour likely to weaken that of Hizbollah, which answers to Tehran not Beirut.

Neither Israel nor the United States will take any of this into account if war breaks out in Lebanon. A conflict will quickly escalate to the highest levels of violence. As in countless previous wars, it will only bolster the most hard-line elements. The problem is that the big losers in Lebanon will be state institutions as well as those in society who have no sympathy for Hizbollah. How the party would suffer from such a situation is a mystery. But Mr Lieberman needs to provide an answer.

Champion v Champion (PFL v Bellator)

Heavyweight: Renan Ferreira v Ryan Bader
Middleweight: Impa Kasanganay v Johnny Eblen
Featherweight: Jesus Pinedo v Patricio Pitbull
Catchweight: Ray Cooper III v Jason Jackson

Showcase Bouts
Heavyweight: Bruno Cappelozza (former PFL World champ) v Vadim Nemkov (former Bellator champ)
Light Heavyweight: Thiago Santos (PFL title contender) v Yoel Romero (Bellator title contender)
Lightweight: Clay Collard (PFL title contender) v AJ McKee (former Bellator champ)
Featherweight: Gabriel Braga (PFL title contender) v Aaron Pico (Bellator title contender)
Lightweight: Biaggio Ali Walsh (pro debut) v Emmanuel Palacios (pro debut)
Women’s Lightweight: Claressa Shields v Kelsey DeSantis
Featherweight: Abdullah Al Qahtani v Edukondal Rao
Amateur Flyweight: Malik Basahel v Vinicius Pereira


Company: Eco Way
Started: December 2023
Founder: Ivan Kroshnyi
Based: Dubai, UAE
Industry: Electric vehicles
Investors: Bootstrapped with undisclosed funding. Looking to raise funds from outside

Iftar programme at the Sheikh Mohammed Centre for Cultural Understanding

Established in 1998, the Sheikh Mohammed Centre for Cultural Understanding was created with a vision to teach residents about the traditions and customs of the UAE. Its motto is ‘open doors, open minds’. All year-round, visitors can sign up for a traditional Emirati breakfast, lunch or dinner meal, as well as a range of walking tours, including ones to sites such as the Jumeirah Mosque or Al Fahidi Historical Neighbourhood.

Every year during Ramadan, an iftar programme is rolled out. This allows guests to break their fast with the centre’s presenters, visit a nearby mosque and observe their guides while they pray. These events last for about two hours and are open to the public, or can be booked for a private event.

Until the end of Ramadan, the iftar events take place from 7pm until 9pm, from Saturday to Thursday. Advanced booking is required.

For more details, email or visit


India cancels school-leaving examinations
Women’s T20 World Cup Qualifier

UAE results
Ireland beat UAE by six wickets
Zimbabwe beat UAE by eight wickets
UAE beat Netherlands by 10 wickets

UAE v Vanuatu, Thursday, 3pm, Zayed Cricket Stadium
Ireland v Netherlands, 7.30pm, Zayed Cricket Stadium

Group B table
1) Ireland 3 3 0 6 +2.407
2. Netherlands 3 2 1 4 +1.117
3) UAE 3 1 2 2 0.000
4) Zimbabwe 4 1 3 2 -0.844
5) Vanuatu 3 1 2 2 -2.180

Army of the Dead

Director: Zack Snyder

Stars: Dave Bautista, Ella Purnell, Omari Hardwick, Ana de la Reguera

Three stars

Most wanted allegations
  • Benjamin Macann, 32: involvement in cocaine smuggling gang.
  • Jack Mayle, 30: sold drugs from a phone line called the Flavour Quest.
  • Callum Halpin, 27: over the 2018 murder of a rival drug dealer. 
  • Asim Naveed, 29: accused of being the leader of a gang that imported cocaine.
  • Calvin Parris, 32: accused of buying cocaine from Naveed and selling it on.
  • John James Jones, 31: allegedly stabbed two people causing serious injuries.
  • Callum Michael Allan, 23: alleged drug dealing and assaulting an emergency worker.
  • Dean Garforth, 29: part of a crime gang that sold drugs and guns.
  • Joshua Dillon Hendry, 30: accused of trafficking heroin and crack cocain. 
  • Mark Francis Roberts, 28: grievous bodily harm after a bungled attempt to steal a+£60,000 watch.
  • James+‘Jamie’ Stevenson, 56: for arson and over the seizure of a tonne of cocaine.
  • Nana Oppong, 41: shot a man eight times in a suspected gangland reprisal attack. 
If you go:


Getting there:

Flying to Guyana requires first reaching New York with either Emirates or Etihad, then connecting with JetBlue or Caribbean Air at JFK airport. Prices start from around Dh7,000.


Getting around:

Wildlife Worldwide offers a range of Guyana itineraries, such as its small group tour, the 15-day ‘Ultimate Guyana Nature Experience’ which features Georgetown, the Iwokrama Rainforest (one of the world’s four remaining pristine tropical rainforests left in the world), the Amerindian village of Surama and the Rupununi Savannah, known for its giant anteaters and river otters;

Washmen Profile

Date Started: May 2015

Founders: Rami Shaar and Jad Halaoui

Based: Dubai, UAE

Sector: Laundry

Employees: 170

Funding: about $8m

Funders: Addventure, B&Y Partners, Clara Ventures, Cedar Mundi Partners, Henkel Ventures

Our legal consultants

Name: Hassan Mohsen Elhais

Position: legal consultant with Al Rowaad Advocates and Legal Consultants.

What are NFTs?

Are non-fungible tokens a currency, asset, or a licensing instrument? Arnab Das, global market strategist EMEA at Invesco, says they are mix of all of three.

You can buy, hold and use NFTs just like US dollars and Bitcoins. “They can appreciate in value and even produce cash flows.”

However, while money is fungible, NFTs are not. “One Bitcoin, dollar, euro or dirham is largely indistinguishable from the next. Nothing ties a dollar bill to a particular owner, for example. Nor does it tie you to to any goods, services or assets you bought with that currency. In contrast, NFTs confer specific ownership,” Mr Das says.

This makes NFTs closer to a piece of intellectual property such as a work of art or licence, as you can claim royalties or profit by exchanging it at a higher value later, Mr Das says. “They could provide a sustainable income stream.”

This income will depend on future demand and use, which makes NFTs difficult to value. “However, there is a credible use case for many forms of intellectual property, notably art, songs, videos,” Mr Das says.