As some countries begin to loosen restrictions on movement and the air travel industry prepares to resume some activity over the summer, the debate around safe travel in times of coronavirus is all the more pressing. Last week, the International Air Transport Association signaled support for passengers wearing masks on flights, but it backtracked on leaving middle seats empty on aircrafts. Iata’s chief economist Brian Pearce says that most airlines would be unable to generate revenue if a third of all sets are left empty in their aircrafts.
The coronavirus pandemic continues, and looks set to send the travel sector, along with many other sectors, into a new era of temperature checks and physical distancing.
Travel restrictions rolled out since March have taken an immense toll on airlines, with American carriers forced to reduce their capacity by almost 60 per cent and ground half of their fleet. The imperative to make up for these losses is a matter of survival.
While prospective travelers may be thrilled to be able to reconnect with their families or return home after months of lockdown, many have expressed concern that the resumption of flights may come at the expense of passenger and crew health. Here in the UAE, airports and airlines have led the way in taking safety precautions and assuring passengers but this is not the case around the world.
Widely shared video footage of a packed Beirut-bound flight from London, in which many passengers were not wearing masks and were unable to abide by physical distancing rules, caused outrage in Lebanon, especially as travellers had paid a high fare in the belief that many seats would remain empty out of precaution. A US carrier has also come under fire for overcharging passengers who had reserved a spot next to an empty seat. Emirates, meanwhile, has introduced physical distancing and banned print magazines on all its flights.
Airliners have resorted to a wide range of practices to balance between generating revenue and protecting passengers, but the variation in approaches risks dampening the overall confidence of would-be travellers further. Airportsaround the world, too, appear no closer to establishing uniform, universal best practices. While temperature checks have become mandatory in most airports, testing prior to boarding is not. Even in cases where passengers get tested before departure, as has been trialled on certain flights in the UAE, and physical distancing and masks are mandatory on the aircraft, the screening process upon arrival continues to vary widely by country. The UK has only now, nearly two months after its lockdown began, announced that passengers will need to quarantine upon arrival, a practice that has been in place in the UAE for several weeks now.
Airliners have resorted to a wide range of practices to balance between generating revenue and protecting passengers, but this variation risks dampening the overall confidence of would-be travellers
The disparities in public health practices, if it continues, will heighten the sense of fear and diminish trust among the air travel industry’s employees, passengers and investors alike. This is all the more concerning for an industry in which trust and safety are paramount. Global co-operation, and a clear set of international guidelines for all stages of air travel, from the check-in desk to the baggage claim and every part of the journey in between, have to be put in place around the world. The coronavirus is highly contagious. It has managed to spread from a single city in central China to virtually all countries in the world in a matter of months. While it may seem like airports and airlines have to choose between accepting that reality and saving their businesses, that is a false choice. If we want to take to the skies once again, we must first come to grips with what’s happening on the ground.
FIGHT CARD
Sara El Bakkali v Anisha Kadka (Lightweight, female)
Mohammed Adil Al Debi v Moaz Abdelgawad (Bantamweight)
Amir Boureslan v Mahmoud Zanouny (Welterweight)
Abrorbek Madaminbekov v Mohammed Al Katheeri (Featherweight)
Ibrahem Bilal v Emad Arafa (Super featherweight)
Ahmed Abdolaziz v Imad Essassi (Middleweight)
Milena Martinou v Ilham Bourakkadi (Bantamweight, female)
Noureddine El Agouti v Mohamed Mardi (Welterweight)
Nabil Ouach v Ymad Atrous (Middleweight)
Nouredin Samir v Zainalabid Dadachev (Lightweight)
Marlon Ribeiro v Mehdi Oubahammou (Welterweight)
Brad Stanton v Mohamed El Boukhari (Super welterweight
A comparison of sending Dh20,000 from the UAE using two different routes at the same time - the first direct from a UAE bank to a bank in Germany, and the second from the same UAE bank via an online platform to Germany - found key differences in cost and speed. The transfers were both initiated on January 30.
Route 1: bank transfer
The UAE bank charged Dh152.25 for the Dh20,000 transfer. On top of that, their exchange rate margin added a difference of around Dh415, compared with the mid-market rate.
Total cost: Dh567.25 - around 2.9 per cent of the total amount
Total received: €4,670.30
Route 2: online platform
The UAE bank’s charge for sending Dh20,000 to a UK dirham-denominated account was Dh2.10. The exchange rate margin cost was Dh60, plus a Dh12 fee.
Total cost: Dh74.10, around 0.4 per cent of the transaction
Total received: €4,756
The UAE bank transfer was far quicker – around two to three working days, while the online platform took around four to five days, but was considerably cheaper. In the online platform transfer, the funds were also exposed to currency risk during the period it took for them to arrive.
The National Archives, Abu Dhabi
Founded over 50 years ago, the National Archives collects valuable historical material relating to the UAE, and is the oldest and richest archive relating to the Arabian Gulf.
Much of the material can be viewed on line at the Arabian Gulf Digital Archive - https://www.agda.ae/en