Why Alphabet’s $118bn cash pile could be a new problem

The Google parent has a less clearly-defined capital return strategy, leaving investors seeking more detail on its plans

Alphabet has cash and short-term marketable securities of about $118 billion, more than any other company in the Nasdaq 100 Stock Index aside from Apple’s total of about $167 billion. AP

Alphabet is facing a new and, by most accounts, welcome problem – how to spend its rapidly expanding pile of cash.

The Google owner generated nearly $29 billion in cash in the second quarter after cutting thousands of jobs and efforts to stem losses in its various moonshot projects.

That left Alphabet with cash and short-term marketable securities of about $118 billion, more than any other company in the Nasdaq 100 Stock Index aside from Apple’s total of about $167 billion.

However, unlike Apple, which aims to give back most of its cash to shareholders via stock buybacks and dividends, Alphabet has a less clearly-defined capital return strategy, leaving investors seeking more detail on its plans.

“We haven’t really had to address this issue with Alphabet in the past because they hadn’t been as prolific with generating this kind of cash,” Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust, said in an interview. His funds own Alphabet shares.

Generally, investors aren’t fond of companies sitting on large amounts of cash and expect the money to be invested for better returns or given back to shareholders.

The top three cash generators in the Nasdaq 100 – Alphabet, Apple and Microsoft – brought in a combined $84 billion in the last quarter, the biggest haul for any such non-holiday period in history, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Alphabet has stepped up buybacks and expanded its repurchase authorisation to $70 billion in April. But last quarter, the firm spent $15 billion on its own shares, barely half of the cash it brought in.

By contrast, Apple in the past five fiscal years has returned almost $5 billion more than the record $454 billion in cash it generated.

Last month, Alphabet said Ruth Porat, who has served as chief financial officer since 2015, will assume a newly created role of president and chief investment officer.

Alphabet doesn’t pay a dividend like Apple and Microsoft. And in contrast with Microsoft, which agreed to pay $69 billion for video game maker Activision Blizzard last year, Alphabet has shied away from big acquisitions.

Even if executives wanted to, Alphabet may not be able to pull off a big acquisition given heightened regulatory scrutiny. Microsoft’s road to closing its Activision deal has been rocky and Amazon’s acquisition of Roomba maker iRobot is still being probed by regulators.

“Having the ability to make a big splash the way Microsoft is doing with Activision is difficult given the regulatory environment,” said Angelo Zino, senior equity analyst at CFRA Research. Alphabet is more likely to continue to make incremental deals “at a very small level", he said.

To Synovus Trust’s Mr Morgan, it might be wiser for Alphabet to make more strategic investments like Microsoft has done with ChatGPT owner OpenAI. This would instantly boost shareholder value and help the company gain recognition for making inroads into industries that it’s not traditionally been as strong in, he said.

But for now, share buybacks seem like the most popular tool being implemented to return cash to shareholders at big tech firms that bring in tens of billions in earnings every quarter.

“Although Alphabet could always consider initiating a small dividend, we think it’s more likely to stick to the buyback approach,” Mr Zino said. “A dividend could send a perception that growth opportunities may not be as strong.”