Why you should never dump stocks when markets tumble

Many investors hung on when US markets went into a tailspin in February, but those who cashed out are struggling to find a low-cost re-entry point

It's not easy for investors to watch money vanish as markets tumble, but holding on to stocks is the best course of action as the crisis will pass. AFP

There are only a few basic rules of investing: diversify, keep your costs low and, probably the most important, hang on when markets tumble occasionally. The last one is the trickiest. It’s not easy watching money vanish as the market plunges, particularly when many people are carping about the end of the world, which invariably accompanies a market collapse.

So it was when Covid-19 sent US stocks into a tailspin in late February. The S&P 500 Index shed a third of its value in just over four weeks, one of the steepest retreats on record amid widespread chatter that the pandemic would plunge the US into a long depression, wiping out whole industries and permanently damaging broad swathes of the economy.

Hanging on to stocks through that chaos was no small feat and, amazingly, most investors managed to do it.

Vanguard Group, which oversees more than $6 trillion in assets, found that less than 0.5 per cent of its retail clients and self-directed investors in its retirement plans panicked and moved to all cash between February 19, the market’s pre-coronavirus peak, and May 31.

That’s a big change from previous meltdowns, most recently the 2008 financial crisis, when investors dumped stocks in droves. It seems to have finally sunk in that all crises pass and that the stock market eventually recovers, no matter how desperate things seem at the time.

True to form, the market recovered sooner than anyone expected. It shot higher in late March and surpassed its pre-Covid high in August, even as the coronavirus showed few signs of slowing.

Those who dumped their stocks along the way, gambling that the market is poised for a long slump and would give them an opening to re-enter at even lower prices, now face a hard choice. The market is up roughly 60 per cent from its March low, so getting back in means coming to terms with a costly mistake.

Say you had $100,000 in the market at the pre-coronavirus peak and sold roughly halfway down, recovering about $83,000. If you had stayed in the market, you would have roughly $107,000 today, or close to 30 per cent more money than when you exited. That’s tough to swallow.

The next time – and yes, there will be a next time – investors are tempted to dump their stocks during a crisis, they should focus not on getting out but getting back in

But the alternative is worse. The temptation is to wait stubbornly for the market to revisit its lows, a day that may never come. During the financial crisis, the market turned sharply higher in March 2009, even though it was not yet evident that a collapse of the financial system would be averted. When the all-clear came several months later, the market had risen roughly 60 per cent through October.

Sound familiar? Investors who dumped their stocks during the financial crisis faced the same choice modern-day deserters do now. Those who jumped back in after the crisis eased in 2009 have more than tripled their money despite buying back at what must have seemed like an outrageous price at the time, while those who waited for the elusive ideal re-entry are still waiting.

With rare exception, when the market surges from the depths of a crisis, it’s a signal that it has moved on, even if some investors have not. Chances are, the market has moved on from Covid-19, and investors should, too.

The next time – and yes, there will be a next time – investors are tempted to dump their stocks during a crisis, they should focus not on getting out but getting back in. That should clarify the wisdom of staying put. No one can anticipate the bottom in advance, which means that the re-entry will either be too early or too late. And too early is unrealistic.

If you’re tempted to run for the exit when the market is down 20 per cent, you probably won’t be in the mood to buy when it’s down 30 per cent or more. That leaves one alternative: buying late, which is the pickle some investors are in now. It’s best to avoid that quandary altogether by remaining invested.

For now, those who got out should recognise that there will never be a better time to get back in, at least one that can be known in advance.

Nir Kaissar is the founder of Unison Advisors, an asset management firm. 

• Bloomberg