Protesters in Florida, US, gather to denounce Israeli actions in Gaza, while supporters of Israel demonstrate across the street. AP
Protesters in Florida, US, gather to denounce Israeli actions in Gaza, while supporters of Israel demonstrate across the street. AP
Protesters in Florida, US, gather to denounce Israeli actions in Gaza, while supporters of Israel demonstrate across the street. AP
Protesters in Florida, US, gather to denounce Israeli actions in Gaza, while supporters of Israel demonstrate across the street. AP


My generation of westerners may have been the last to support Israel unconditionally


  • English
  • Arabic

November 15, 2023

In the weeks since the barbaric Hamas attack of October 7, I’ve made a point of speaking to my Jewish friends in the UK and America, to make sure I’m hearing their voices as well as those of my friends and colleagues in Malaysia and the Gulf, the overwhelming majority of whom are Muslim, Arab or both.

The other day I talked to a Jewish friend who personally knew some of the Israelis who were murdered by Hamas. Wasn’t he worried, I asked, about how worldwide opinion is increasingly hardening against Israel over its cruelly punitive actions in Gaza, which have resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent children?

“We have no alternative but to annihilate Hamas,” he told me. “The feeling is: people hate us anyway. If they hate us even more after this, we can live with that.”

That was a disturbing statement on many levels. But on one, I think it was just wrong. For if Israel becomes almost completely isolated over the ruination it is visiting on Gaza, I worry that it may risk undermining the foundations on which its existence depends.

Let me explain. If you grew up in the West in the 1970s and 80s, as I did, support for Israel was widespread. Many saw Israelis as a hardy, heroic people who had conducted daring operations, such as the hostage rescue at Entebbe airport in 1976, and practised a kind of “socialism that works” at a time when social democracy was greatly admired in Europe. They could make peace, too, as they did with Egypt at the Camp David Accords in 1978.

In the UK, a multitude of celebrated figures across public life were Jewish – not the same as being Israeli of course – many beloved, like Yehudi Menuhin, whose rendition of the Beethoven Violin Concerto was the first LP record I ever bought. Observant Christians – there were far more of them in Britain back then – felt the Jewish people were the descendants of ancient biblical tribes whose home had been returned to them. Rarely was a mention of occupation made.

The Palestinians, on the other hand, were less understood and more associated by western politicians and media with terrorism. The images of the attack at the 1972 Munich Olympics by Black September and the hijacking of the Achille Lauro ocean liner by the Palestinian Liberation Front in 1985 rang in the minds of many. I can still remember watching a TV news report about how an elderly Jewish American man in a wheelchair, Leon Klinghoffer, was murdered and thrown overboard. By this point I had become aware that the situation was more complex. My family had lived in Riyadh, and the PLO had an office nearby. Clearly, there were legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people. Even so, I recall that when I went to a talk by Afif Safieh, the Palestinian delegate to the UK, as a student in 1990, it still felt like a mildly transgressive act.

If Israel becomes almost completely isolated over the ruination it is visiting on Gaza, it may risk undermining the foundations on which its existence depends

It's all very different today. For younger people just beginning to learn about Palestine and Israel, there will appear nothing remotely heroic about the devastating pictures and reports coming out of Gaza. Israel has been a very poor advert for democracy for a long time, and the system could have no worse poster boy than the inflammatory prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, whom nearly 80 per cent of his compatriots want to resign, according to a recent poll. The country’s leadership doesn’t want a negotiated peace, or not according to Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter, who told a TV channel over the weekend: “We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba”; and not according to the settler leader interviewed by the New Yorker, who stated that “the borders of the homeland for the Jews are the Euphrates in the east and the Nile in the southwest”.

Meanwhile, there are plenty of sympathetic Palestinian voices being heard since October 7, and others like the Egyptian comedian Bassem Youssef, whose two interviews with Piers Morgan have racked up tens of millions of views on YouTube. When Youssef points out that some Palestinians wear keys around their necks – keys to the houses they lost in 1948 during the establishment of the State of Israel – many younger people will think: "Why on earth should they not have the right to return to their properties?" Morally, that right is hard to dispute; but its enactment would threaten the existence of the State of Israel as it is currently constituted.

This not to claim that the histories of the two peoples are not highly complicated and contested. It is to point out that the overwhelming impression for many younger people will be of Israel inflicting terrible suffering on the Palestinians; and those same people are now hearing far more about the dispossession of the Palestinians than my generation did.

Also crucial to this difference of perception and sympathy, I believe, is the sense of proximity to the Second World War and the Holocaust. It wasn’t just that TV in the West was full of films and programmes about the war when my generation was growing up there. Our grandfathers fought in it; some of them were among the liberators of the death camps. The tragedy of the Jewish people was very tangible because it was linked to people we knew deeply, and it happened at a time to which we could relate. That gave Israel an iron support, an unshakeable foundation constructed of the moral certitude that this must never happen again.

To young people today, however, the war is as distant timewise from them as the First World War was to my classmates – a historical event, the bitter tail end of the long 19th century. It's not that they think the Holocaust doesn't matter. But they are highly unlikely to have grown up knowing people who were affected by it, still less had the chance to visit a survivor regularly, as I did in my 20s.

So there's a tremendous amount of unquestioned support that Israel cannot take for granted any more. The fact that its current actions are alienating much of the world truly matters, as the Jewish people – perhaps the most persecuted ethnic group in the history of humanity – really do need to feel secure and protected.

We know that Mr Netanyahu's policies undermined Israel's safety at home before October 7. What I fear is that his brutal response to the Hamas atrocities is doing more than anyone else could to undermine its safety and longevity abroad.

Global state-owned investor ranking by size

1.

United States

2.

China

3.

UAE

4.

Japan

5

Norway

6.

Canada

7.

Singapore

8.

Australia

9.

Saudi Arabia

10.

South Korea

Last-16

France 4
Griezmann (13' pen), Pavard (57'), Mbappe (64', 68')

Argentina 3
Di Maria (41'), Mercado (48'), Aguero (90 3')

Nepotism is the name of the game

Salman Khan’s father, Salim Khan, is one of Bollywood’s most legendary screenwriters. Through his partnership with co-writer Javed Akhtar, Salim is credited with having paved the path for the Indian film industry’s blockbuster format in the 1970s. Something his son now rules the roost of. More importantly, the Salim-Javed duo also created the persona of the “angry young man” for Bollywood megastar Amitabh Bachchan in the 1970s, reflecting the angst of the average Indian. In choosing to be the ordinary man’s “hero” as opposed to a thespian in new Bollywood, Salman Khan remains tightly linked to his father’s oeuvre. Thanks dad. 

The Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index

The Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index

Mazen Abukhater, principal and actuary at global consultancy Mercer, Middle East, says the company’s Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index - which benchmarks 34 pension schemes across the globe to assess their adequacy, sustainability and integrity - included Saudi Arabia for the first time this year to offer a glimpse into the region.

The index highlighted fundamental issues for all 34 countries, such as a rapid ageing population and a low growth / low interest environment putting pressure on expected returns. It also highlighted the increasing popularity around the world of defined contribution schemes.

“Average life expectancy has been increasing by about three years every 10 years. Someone born in 1947 is expected to live until 85 whereas someone born in 2007 is expected to live to 103,” Mr Abukhater told the Mena Pensions Conference.

“Are our systems equipped to handle these kind of life expectancies in the future? If so many people retire at 60, they are going to be in retirement for 43 years – so we need to adapt our retirement age to our changing life expectancy.”

Saudi Arabia came in the middle of Mercer’s ranking with a score of 58.9. The report said the country's index could be raised by improving the minimum level of support for the poorest aged individuals and increasing the labour force participation rate at older ages as life expectancies rise.

Mr Abukhater said the challenges of an ageing population, increased life expectancy and some individuals relying solely on their government for financial support in their retirement years will put the system under strain.

“To relieve that pressure, governments need to consider whether it is time to switch to a defined contribution scheme so that individuals can supplement their own future with the help of government support,” he said.

Match info

Australia 580
Pakistan 240 and 335

Result: Australia win by an innings and five runs

Russia's Muslim Heartlands

Dominic Rubin, Oxford

UAE currency: the story behind the money in your pockets

At Eternity’s Gate

Director: Julian Schnabel

Starring: Willem Dafoe, Oscar Isaacs, Mads Mikkelsen

Three stars

While you're here
COMPANY%20PROFILE
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ECompany%20name%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%203S%20Money%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EStarted%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%202018%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EBased%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20London%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EFounders%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Ivan%20Zhiznevsky%2C%20Eugene%20Dugaev%20and%20Andrei%20Dikouchine%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3ESector%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20FinTech%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EInvestment%20stage%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20%245.6%20million%20raised%20in%20total%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
COMPANY%20PROFILE
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3ECompany%20name%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Mozn%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStarted%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%202017%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFounders%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Mohammed%20Alhussein%2C%20Khaled%20Al%20Ghoneim%2C%20Abdullah%20Alsaeed%20and%20Malik%20Alyousef%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EBased%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Riyadh%2C%20Saudi%20Arabia%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EIndustry%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20FinTech%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFunding%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20%2410%20million%3C%2Fp%3E%0A%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EInvestors%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20Raed%20Ventures%2C%20Shorooq%20Partners%2C%20VentureSouq%2C%20Sukna%20Ventures%20and%20others%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
The specs

Engine: Four electric motors, one at each wheel

Power: 579hp

Torque: 859Nm

Transmission: Single-speed automatic

Price: From Dh825,900

On sale: Now

The%20Caine%20Mutiny%20Court-Martial%20
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EDirector%3A%20%3C%2Fstrong%3EWilliam%20Friedkin%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3EStars%3A%20%3C%2Fstrong%3EKiefer%20Sutherland%2C%20Jason%20Clarke%2C%20Jake%20Lacy%3Cbr%3E%3Cstrong%3ERating%3A%20%3C%2Fstrong%3E3%2F5%3C%2Fp%3E%0A
Updated: November 15, 2023, 7:37 AM`