Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The United Nations removed his name from its ISIL group and Al Qaeda sanctions list. (AP photo)
Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The United Nations removed his name from its ISIL group and Al Qaeda sanctions list. (AP photo)
Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The United Nations removed his name from its ISIL group and Al Qaeda sanctions list. (AP photo)
Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The United Nations removed his name from its ISIL group and Al Qaeda sanctions list. (AP photo)

UN lifts sanctions on notorious Afghan warlord Hekmatyar


  • English
  • Arabic

KABUL // The UN Security Council has dropped sanctions against Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, paving the way for him to return openly to Afghanistan.

The Afghan government requested the move as part of a peace deal with Mr Hekmatyar and his militant group, Hezb-i-Islami, in September.

The deal was criticised by some Afghans and human rights groups for the pardon it granted to Mr Hekmatyar and many of his fighters.

While playing only a small role in the current insurgency in Afghanistan, Mr Hekmatyar was a major figure during the bloody civil war of the 1990s, when he was accused of indiscriminately firing rockets into Kabul, as well as other human-rights abuses.

The Afghan government welcomed the UN’s decision on Friday as a “a major step toward peace and stability in Afghanistan”.

“This was a demand of the people and government of Afghanistan,” said Mohammad Akram Khpalwak, a political adviser to president Ashraf Ghani.

“It is a major step for the peace process between Hezb-i-Islami and the government of Afghanistan.”

In removing Mr Hekmatyar from the list of people sanctioned for their ties to Al Qaeda, ISIL, and other militant groups, the UN unfroze his assets, and dropped a travel ban and arms embargo against him.

Mr Hekmatyar’s whereabouts have been unknown since he signed the peace deal with Mr Ghani in September via a video conference from an undisclosed location.

With the UN sanctions now removed, government officials expect Mr Hekmatyar to eventually return to the Afghan capital, despite the continued controversy.

Many foreign governments, including the United States, praised the accord at the time as a step toward wider peace in Afghanistan.

Diplomatic sources said Russia was the only Security Council member to oppose the lifting of sanctions. France was initially reluctant because of Hezb-i-Islami’s involvement in an ambush that cost the lives of 10 French soldiers in August 2008, but later changed its mind.

“It is an important point of the peace agreement between Hezb-i-Islami and the Afghan government,” said Mr Hekmatyar’s chief negotiator, Amin Karim.

“And it shows the commitment from the government and from the Hezb-i-Islami to pursue on this peace track,” Karim said.

It would also “open the door” and stimulate the peace process and would send a “strong signal to other fighters” in the country, he said in reference to the Taliban.

Mr Hekmatyar is seen as a potential rival to Mr Ghani and chief executive Abdullah Abdullah, who have governed the country through a shaky, US-brokered power-sharing agreement since disputed presidential elections in 2014. His return could stir up new political uncertainty as the government struggles to confront a reinvigorated Taliban that has been advancing on several fronts.

The warlord battled the Soviets in the 1980s and then took part in the civil war that erupted after their withdrawal, clashing with the so-called Northern Alliance. He was driven out when the Taliban seized power in 1996, but returned after the American invasion, vowing to resist what he termed the foreign “occupation”.

His forces were largely confined to just two provinces, however, and have carried out few attacks in recent years. He is believed to be in hiding somewhere in the eastern Kunar province, where he enjoys popular support, and makes occasional trips into Pakistan through the nearby border.

* Agencies

Ten tax points to be aware of in 2026

1. Domestic VAT refund amendments: request your refund within five years

If a business does not apply for the refund on time, they lose their credit.

2. E-invoicing in the UAE

Businesses should continue preparing for the implementation of e-invoicing in the UAE, with 2026 a preparation and transition period ahead of phased mandatory adoption. 

3. More tax audits

Tax authorities are increasingly using data already available across multiple filings to identify audit risks. 

4. More beneficial VAT and excise tax penalty regime

Tax disputes are expected to become more frequent and more structured, with clearer administrative objection and appeal processes. The UAE has adopted a new penalty regime for VAT and excise disputes, which now mirrors the penalty regime for corporate tax.

5. Greater emphasis on statutory audit

There is a greater need for the accuracy of financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards standards need to be strictly adhered to and, as a result, the quality of the audits will need to increase.

6. Further transfer pricing enforcement

Transfer pricing enforcement, which refers to the practice of establishing prices for internal transactions between related entities, is expected to broaden in scope. The UAE will shortly open the possibility to negotiate advance pricing agreements, or essentially rulings for transfer pricing purposes. 

7. Limited time periods for audits

Recent amendments also introduce a default five-year limitation period for tax audits and assessments, subject to specific statutory exceptions. While the standard audit and assessment period is five years, this may be extended to up to 15 years in cases involving fraud or tax evasion. 

8. Pillar 2 implementation 

Many multinational groups will begin to feel the practical effect of the Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (DMTT), the UAE's implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax under Pillar 2. While the rules apply for financial years starting on or after January 1, 2025, it is 2026 that marks the transition to an operational phase.

9. Reduced compliance obligations for imported goods and services

Businesses that apply the reverse-charge mechanism for VAT purposes in the UAE may benefit from reduced compliance obligations. 

10. Substance and CbC reporting focus

Tax authorities are expected to continue strengthening the enforcement of economic substance and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting frameworks. In the UAE, these regimes are increasingly being used as risk-assessment tools, providing tax authorities with a comprehensive view of multinational groups’ global footprints and enabling them to assess whether profits are aligned with real economic activity. 

Contributed by Thomas Vanhee and Hend Rashwan, Aurifer