Indian scientists and engineers from the Indian Space Research Organisation monitor the Mars Orbiter Mission at the ISRO telemetry, tracking and command centre in Bangalore. Manjunath Kiran / AFP Photo
Indian scientists and engineers from the Indian Space Research Organisation monitor the Mars Orbiter Mission at the ISRO telemetry, tracking and command centre in Bangalore. Manjunath Kiran / AFP PhotShow more

Have India’s rocket men sent a nation on a wrong-headed quest for status?



The space age began when the Soviets hoisted the first artificial Earth satellite into orbit in 1957. India joined this epoch six years later. Reaching for the skies at a time when an overwhelming majority of its people, impoverished and illiterate, scratched a living from agriculture seemed to its critics like a dereliction of terrestrial duties. Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister, disagreed. Science, he argued, was indispensable to ending the problems of “hunger and poverty, insanitation and illiteracy, of superstition and deadening custom”. India, though poor, had vast reserves of talent. And Nehru recruited Homi Bhabha and Vikram Sarabhai, an exceedingly gifted pair of scientists, to advance his vision. Collectively, this Cantabrigian trio – urbane, privileged, patrician – succeeded in convincing the Cold War rivals to collaborate on India’s incipient space programme.

India made its first foray into space in November 1963. The Soviets supplied a computer and a helicopter. The French provided the payload. The Americans contributed the Nike-Apache research rocket that was lofted into space. The only thing Indian about this mission was its ingenuity. On the site deemed ideal for the launch, in a village on India’s Malabar Coast, stood a church dating back to the seventeenth-century. Religious feelings, especially of minorities, were fiercely guarded under Nehru; the launch could not proceed without the consent of Kerala’s Christian community. After brief negotiations, however, the custodians of the church gave away the building. A commemorative plaque at the old church, now converted to a museum, reads: “The church authorities and the parishioners decided in a gracious and exemplary manner to dedicate this place of worship on the altar of science”. Components of the rocket were transported on the backs of bicycles; heavier equipment was moved in oxcarts.

On the evening of November 21, the night before John F Kennedy, America’s great champion of the space race, was shot in Dallas, the rocket ascended into the skies, releasing a triumphant burst of sodium cloud and heralding the birth of India’s ambitious space research programme.

By the end of the decade, the government had created the Indian Space Research Organisation. Its costs, thanks in large part to New Delhi’s close relationship with Moscow, remained low. The Soviets launched India’s first satellite, Aryabhata, gratis. They charged heavily discounted fees for subsequent launches. But the Indo-Soviet cooperation concealed the rapid development of India’s own capabilities.

The USSR’s demise was greeted by India’s governing elite as a calamity – but the Indian Space Research Organisation, which benefited so greatly from Soviet largesse, suffered virtually no adverse consequence. Indeed, today it is an important player in the commercial space market – a reliable and cost-effective vehicle for foreign governments and space entrepreneurs seeking to launch satellites. Last year, it placed 20 satellites in two different orbits. Last month, it deposited 104 rockets in orbit using a single rocket – surpassing by a substantial margin the record of 37 satellites held by Russia’s space agency.

The Indian Space Research Organisation has travelled far, but the criticism directed at it has remained largely the same. Why is a poor country diverting resources to a space programme?

Part of the reason for the persistence of such disapproval is the seeming neglect of the original purpose of space research: to improve, as Sarabhai saw it, the lives of India’s poor. India, for all its progress, is still home to the largest population of the world’s poorest people. Its satellites have connected Indian villages and helped save lives during natural disasters. But how, for instance, did the Indian Space Research Organisation’s Mars mission serve the original goal? The fact that many Indians take pride in the organisation’s achievement in making India the first country in the world to install a space probe in Mars’s orbit on the first attempt is hardly a reason not to ask what the scientific and social benefits of the mission are. A former head of the organisation denounced the Mars mission as “moonshine”, a vanity project with no scientific value. The economist Jean Dreze linked it to the “Indian elite’s delusional quest for superpower status”.

Such criticisms are not easy to refute. But they overlook a key fact: China. India’s space programme can no longer be viewed in isolation from China’s. India’s decisions in space are driven by the urgent need to play catch-up with Beijing. China has militarised its space programme. In 2013, for instance, it tested a second anti-satellite missile test (the first occurred in 2007). India declared that it had the capability to develop its own anti-satellite missiles on short notice, but stopped short of testing. The point of the Mars mission is to belong in the vanguard of spacefaring powers. To fall behind in space research and exploration, as far as New Delhi is concerned, is to cede ground to adversaries.

The Indian Space Research Organisation, in any case, has not abandoned its original purpose. In the 1970s, Soviet scientists handed their Indian counterparts lunar samples. And India is now at the forefront of an ambitious plan to mine He3 – a helium isotope – from lunar dust. He3 can be used as a fuel in reactors to generate energy through non-radioactive nuclear fusion. Ten tonnes of He3, it has been estimated, can provide as much energy as a billion tonnes of coal. China has already made significant preparations to tap this resource. There are reports that its Chang-e lunar programme, which began with a robotic mission in 2007, may culminate in the not too distant future in a manned outpost on the Moon’s surface to oversee the extraction of He3. New Delhi is once again playing catch-up with Beijing. The Indian Space Research Organisation has pledged to make India energy independent by 2030 with the help of He3. This may be unrealistic, but even modest successes on the Indian Space Research Organisation’s part will have major implications for India. Desalination of seawater is only one of the energy-intensive but necessary projects that the organisation can help accelerate. A country with a coastline as long as India’s should never have to be crippled by water crises.

The prevalence of poverty is not a reason to abandon India’s advances in the sphere of space research. Indians should strive to emulate the work ethic of its space scientists, not condemn them. The budget allocated to the Indian Space Research Organisation is just over $1bn a year. In a country rife with corruption and paralysed by bureaucratic inertia, it is a towering symbol of excellence. Part of the reason social activists resent the organisation is not because it is wasteful but because it provides endless opportunities for boasting by India’s elites.

Judged purely on its performance the Indian Space Research Organisation is arguably the most successful of any Indian entity. This is why the prime minister of India has sought breathlessly to co-opt it in service of his narrowly nationalist enterprise. Its achievements are brandished by Narendra Modi’s myrmidons as evidence of India’s growing might. But the Indian Space Research Organisation did not fall from the skies. It emerged from Nehru’s aspiration to cultivate in Indians a “scientific temper”. Its effloresce has coincided with a regression in politics.

Nehru’s office is now occupied by the most atavistic prime minister in India’s history. Mr Modi has slashed research budgets for laboratories; and, under his aegis, the Indian Science Congress, which for a century served as a forum for some of the world’s brightest minds, has degenerated into a platform for Hindu chauvinists and charlatans. Surviving this obscurantist period in India’s unfolding history may yet be the Indian Space Research Organisation’s greatest challenge.

Kapil Komireddi is a frequent contributor to The National

New schools in Dubai
THE SPECS

Engine: 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder

Transmission: Constant Variable (CVT)

Power: 141bhp 

Torque: 250Nm 

Price: Dh64,500

On sale: Now

Hili 2: Unesco World Heritage site

The site is part of the Hili archaeological park in Al Ain. Excavations there have proved the existence of the earliest known agricultural communities in modern-day UAE. Some date to the Bronze Age but Hili 2 is an Iron Age site. The Iron Age witnessed the development of the falaj, a network of channels that funnelled water from natural springs in the area. Wells allowed settlements to be established, but falaj meant they could grow and thrive. Unesco, the UN's cultural body, awarded Al Ain's sites - including Hili 2 - world heritage status in 2011. Now the most recent dig at the site has revealed even more about the skilled people that lived and worked there.

UPI facts

More than 2.2 million Indian tourists arrived in UAE in 2023
More than 3.5 million Indians reside in UAE
Indian tourists can make purchases in UAE using rupee accounts in India through QR-code-based UPI real-time payment systems
Indian residents in UAE can use their non-resident NRO and NRE accounts held in Indian banks linked to a UAE mobile number for UPI transactions

Living in...

This article is part of a guide on where to live in the UAE. Our reporters will profile some of the country’s most desirable districts, provide an estimate of rental prices and introduce you to some of the residents who call each area home. 

In-demand jobs and monthly salaries
  • Technology expert in robotics and automation: Dh20,000 to Dh40,000 
  • Energy engineer: Dh25,000 to Dh30,000 
  • Production engineer: Dh30,000 to Dh40,000 
  • Data-driven supply chain management professional: Dh30,000 to Dh50,000 
  • HR leader: Dh40,000 to Dh60,000 
  • Engineering leader: Dh30,000 to Dh55,000 
  • Project manager: Dh55,000 to Dh65,000 
  • Senior reservoir engineer: Dh40,000 to Dh55,000 
  • Senior drilling engineer: Dh38,000 to Dh46,000 
  • Senior process engineer: Dh28,000 to Dh38,000 
  • Senior maintenance engineer: Dh22,000 to Dh34,000 
  • Field engineer: Dh6,500 to Dh7,500
  • Field supervisor: Dh9,000 to Dh12,000
  • Field operator: Dh5,000 to Dh7,000
Chatham House Rule

A mark of Chatham House’s influence 100 years on since its founding,  was Moscow’s formal declaration last month that it was an “undesirable
organisation”. 

 

The depth of knowledge and academics that it drew on
following the Ukraine invasion had broadcast Mr Putin’s chicanery.  

 

The institute is more used to accommodating world leaders,
with Nelson Mandela, Margaret Thatcher among those helping it provide
authoritative commentary on world events. 

 

Chatham House was formally founded as the Royal Institute of
International Affairs following the peace conferences of World War One. Its
founder, Lionel Curtis, wanted a more scientific examination of international affairs
with a transparent exchange of information and ideas.  

 

That arena of debate and analysis was enhanced by the “Chatham
House Rule” states that the contents of any meeting can be discussed outside Chatham
House but no mention can be made identifying individuals who commented.  

 

This has enabled some candid exchanges on difficult subjects
allowing a greater degree of free speech from high-ranking figures.  

 

These meetings are highly valued, so much so that
ambassadors reported them in secret diplomatic cables that – when they were
revealed in the Wikileaks reporting – were thus found to have broken the rule. However,
most speeches are held on the record.  

 

Its research and debate has offered fresh ideas to
policymakers enabling them to more coherently address troubling issues from climate
change to health and food security.